SynthesisPloS one2014
Developing an internationally-applicable service specification for continence care: systematic review, evidence synthesis and expert consensus.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can incontinence be cured? A systematic review of cure rates.BMC medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Workload, Availability of Diagnostic Tools, and Treatment Options for Urinary Incontinence and Other Pelvic Floor Disorders in Women: An Online Survey on Practice and Challenges Faced by Providers of Urogynaecological Healthcare in Ten African Countries.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Holistically sustainable continence care: A working definition, the case of single-used absorbent hygiene products (AHPs) and the need for ecosystems thinking.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2024Review
- Incontinence during and following hospitalisation: a prospective study of prevalence, incidence and association with clinical outcomes.Age and ageing · 2023Article
- Article
- Expectations and Perceptions of Dutch Pharmacy Staff Regarding a New Framework for Continence Care: A Focus Group Study.Health services insights · 2021Article
- Public toilets in parklands or open spaces in international cities using geographic information systems.International urogynecology journal · 2020Observational
- Characteristics of Elderly Frequent Attendees in Slovene Family Medicine Practices - a Cross-sectional Study.Materia socio-medica · 2019Article
- Mirabegron, alone and in combination, in the treatment of overactive bladder: real-world evidence and experience.Therapeutic advances in urology · 2018Review
- The increasing importance of a continence nurse specialist to improve outcomes and save costs of urinary incontinence care: an analysis of future policy scenarios.BMC family practice · 2018Article
- A national benchmark for the initial assessment of men with LUTS: data from the 2010 Royal College of Physicians National Audit of Continence Care.World journal of urology · 2016Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Including a Nurse Specialist in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Primary Care in the Netherlands.PloS one · 2015Article
- Understanding Nursing Knowledge of Continence Care and Bladder Scanner Use in Long-Term Care: An Evaluation Study.Gerontology & geriatric medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal demographic trends suggest that the incidence of both urinary and faecal incontinence will rise in the coming years, bringing significant health and economic implications for both patients and payers. There is limited organisational evidence to guide payers and providers about service configuration which will deliver efficient guideline-compliant, high-quality patient care.
objectivesTo create, using evidence from a systematic review, qualitative data and expert consensus an internationally applicable service specification for continence care.
methodEvidence was obtained from a systematic and grey literature review of published randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies reporting efficacy of continence service design at the level of the community dwelling patient with either bladder or bowel incontinence, governmental reports and policy frameworks supplemented by data from 47 semi-structured interviews with clinicians, patients, patient-representatives and policy experts from four geographies broadly representative of different healthcare systems.
resultsA number of themes related to current and potential future organisation of continence care were identified from the data. A modular service specification with eight core components was created including case detection, initial assessment and treatment, case co-ordination, caregiver support, community-based support, specialist assessment and treatment, use of containment products, and use of technology. Within this framework important key recommendations are: ensure robust referral pathways, shift assessment for case coordination to nurses specializing in continence care, promote self-management and technology, use comprehensive assessment tools and service performance targets based on outcome and operational measures.
conclusionsThis study has defined practice gaps in the provision of continence services and described eight core components of a service specification for incontinence that commissioners and payers of health and social care could consider using to provide high-quality continence care. A shift towards a community-delivered, nurse-led model appears to be associated with clinical and cost-effective care for people with bladder and bowel incontinence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.