Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25121014›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2014

Microbiological Profile and Drug Sensitivity Pattern among Community Acquired Pneumonia Patients in Tertiary Care Centre in Mangalore, Coastal Karnataka, India.

Vishak K Acharya, Mahesha Padyana, Unnikrishnan B, Anand R, Preethm R Acharya, Divya Jyoti Juneja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults: An update.The Indian journal of medical research · 2020
    Review
  5. Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2019
    Article
  6. Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Asia-Pacific Region.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Factors influencing severity of community-acquired pneumonia.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vishak K AcharyaAssociate Professor, Department of Chest Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore (Manipal University), India .
Mahesha PadyanaSenior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore (Manipal University), India .
Unnikrishnan BProfessor and Head, Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Mangalore (Manipal University), India .
Anand RProfessor and Head, Department of Chest Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Mangalore (Manipal University), India .
Preethm R AcharyaAssociate Professor, Department of Chest Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Mangalore (Manipal University), India .
Divya Jyoti JunejaMBBS Student, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Mangalore (Manipal University), India .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is the most common respiratory tract infection in day to day practice. The knowledge of organism commonly causative of CAP helps in early empirical treatment initiation.

aimTo study the microbiological profile of patients with community acquired pneumonia and to study drug sensitivity pattern.

methodsHospital based cross sectional study among 100 patients with CAP was conducted in a tertiary care hospital of Southern India. Sputum culture showed that out of 100 patients 39 had an identifiable etiology with 12 patients having evidence of mixed infection.

resultMicro-organisms isolated in sputum culture were Streptococcus pneumoniae (31%) followed by, Pseudomonas pyogens (15%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13%). AFB smear was found to be positive in 6 patients. Organisms were found to be sensitive for piperacillin plus tazobactum (41%), aminoglycocides (amikacin-46%, gentamicin-31%), third generation cephalosporins (Cefotaxim-36%, Ceftriaxone-18%) and macrolides (Erythromicin-31%, Azithromycin-18%). Sensitivity to chloramphenicol was observed in 31% sputum culture positive patients. Ciprofloxacin sensitivity was seen among 49%.

conclusionMost of the organisms were found to be sensitive to monotherapy with extended spectrum beta lactamases, third generation cephalosporins, fluroquinolones, macrolides.

Indexed as

Coastal southern indiaCommunity acquired pneumoniaDrug sensitivityMicrobiological profile

Identifiers

PMID25121014
PMCPMC4129319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.