Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25120809›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

S-1 monotherapy as second line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients previously treated with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil.

Fangfang Lv, Xin Liu, Biyun Wang, Haiyi Guo, Jin Li, Lin Shen, Maolin Jin

RetractedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metastatic gastric cancer treatment: Second line and beyond.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
  5. Emerging role of S-1 in gastric cancer.Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fangfang LvDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai, China ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai, China ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Biyun WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai, China ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Haiyi GuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai, China ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Jin LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai, China ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Lin ShenDepartment of Digestive Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital Beijing, China.
Maolin JinDepartment of Digestive Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment choice of advanced gastric carcinoma after failure from first-line therapy is quite limited. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of S-1 monotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer after failure of first line cisplatin and fluorouracil combination (CF). S-1 monotherapy as a second line treatment was given to the patients who had failed to CF combination in SC-101 study. The efficacy and toxicity of S-1 monotherapy were evaluated exploratory. The results indicated that forty-one patients received S-1 as a second line therapy after disease progression. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 14.6% and 41.5%, respectively. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months (ange: 2.9~6.2 month). The median overall survival time was 6.4 months. The survival rates at 6 month and 1 year were 56% and 7.3%, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events were uncommonly occurred, including anemia (2.4%), neutropenia (2.4%), thrombocytopenia (4.9%) and rash (2.4%). There were no unexpected or life-threatening toxicities. Only one patient experienced dose reduction due to grade 3 rash. In conclusion, S-1 monotherapy provided a mild response rate and overall survival, and a favorable toxicity profile in the second line setting after the first line failure to cisplatin and fluorouracil combination.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalDrug CombinationsFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedOxonic AcidSalvage TherapyStomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDrug CombinationsFluorouracilOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafurchemotherapycisplatin/infusional fluorouracilgastric cancerS-1 monotherapy

Identifiers

PMID25120809
PMCPMC4129044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.