Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25120557›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2014

Development and in silico evaluation of large-scale metabolite identification methods using functional group detection for metabolomics.

Joshua M Mitchell, Teresa W-M Fan, Andrew N Lane, Hunter N B Moseley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Design and Success of a 21st Century Cancer Education Program at the University of Louisville.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Systems-based approaches to unravel multi-species microbial community functioning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua M MitchellDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY, USA.
Teresa W-M FanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY, USA.
Andrew N LaneDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY, USA.
Hunter N B MoseleyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

SAMPLE COREU24DK097215 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI FAN, TERESA WHEI-MEI, HIGASHI, RICHARD M · 2013 to 2017
$8.7M
Systems Biochemistry in Lung Cancer: Toward a Mechanistic Understanding of NSCLCP01CA163223 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FAN, TERESA WHEI-MEI, FAN, TERESA WHEI-MEI · 2013 to 2017
$6.5M
Integrated Chemoselective and Informatic Platform for Large-Scale MetabolomicsR01ES022191 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FAN, TERESA WHEI-MEI, HIGASHI, RICHARD M · 2012 to 2016
$3.4M
University of Louisville Cancer Education ProgramR25CA134283 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HEIN, DAVID W, KIDD, LA CREIS RENEE · 2011 to 2022
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA163223NCI NIH HHS R25 CA134283NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097215NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES022191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale identification of metabolites is key to elucidating and modeling metabolism at the systems level. Advances in metabolomics technologies, particularly ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry (MS) enable comprehensive and rapid analysis of metabolites. However, a significant barrier to meaningful data interpretation is the identification of a wide range of metabolites including unknowns and the determination of their role(s) in various metabolic networks. Chemoselective (CS) probes to tag metabolite functional groups combined with high mass accuracy provide additional structural constraints for metabolite identification and quantification. We have developed a novel algorithm, Chemically Aware Substructure Search (CASS) that efficiently detects functional groups within existing metabolite databases, allowing for combined molecular formula and functional group (from CS tagging) queries to aid in metabolite identification without a priori knowledge. Analysis of the isomeric compounds in both Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) and KEGG Ligand demonstrated a high percentage of isomeric molecular formulae (43 and 28%, respectively), indicating the necessity for techniques such as CS-tagging. Furthermore, these two databases have only moderate overlap in molecular formulae. Thus, it is prudent to use multiple databases in metabolite assignment, since each major metabolite database represents different portions of metabolism within the biosphere. In silico analysis of various CS-tagging strategies under different conditions for adduct formation demonstrate that combined FT-MS derived molecular formulae and CS-tagging can uniquely identify up to 71% of KEGG and 37% of the combined KEGG/HMDB database vs. 41 and 17%, respectively without adduct formation. This difference between database isomer disambiguation highlights the strength of CS-tagging for non-lipid metabolite identification. However, unique identification of complex lipids still needs additional information.

Indexed as

chemical adductchemoselectioncommon subgraph isomorphismFourier transform mass spectrometryfunctional group resolved metabolite databasesgraph theoryisotope-edited NMRmetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID25120557
PMCPMC4112935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.