ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014
Eye movement measurement in diagnostic assessment of disorders of consciousness.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye-Tracking Assessment in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Brain Health in Former Professional Motorsport Drivers: Case Series in a Population Exposed to Sport-Related Concussions and Repetitive Head Impacts.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- Sleuthing subjectivity: a review of covert measures of consciousness.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Eye movement detection using electrooculography and machine learning in cardiac arrest patients.Resuscitation · 2025Article
- Eye tracking to support assessment of patients with prolonged disorder of consciousness - a case series.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2025Observational
- Covert Tracking to Immersive Stimuli in Traumatic Brain Injury Subjects With Disorders of Consciousness.Journal of neurotrauma · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Towards consensus on visual pursuit and visual fixation in patients with disorders of consciousness. A Delphi study.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- Methodological aspects of using a wearable eye-tracker to support diagnostic clinical evaluation of prolonged disorders of consciousness.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2021Observational
- Retrospective analysis of sleep patterns in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness.Sleep medicine: X · 2020Article
- Towards New Diagnostic Approaches in Disorders of Consciousness: A Proof of Concept Study on the Promising Use of Imagery Visuomotor Task.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Assessment of Saccadic Velocity at the Bedside.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2020Article
- Human Computer Interface for Tracking Eye Movements Improves Assessment and Diagnosis of Patients With Acquired Brain Injuries.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Are visual functions diagnostic signs of the minimally conscious state? an integrative review.Journal of neurology · 2018Review
- Antisaccadic Eye Movements Are Correlated with Corpus Callosum White Matter Mean Diffusivity, Stroop Performance, and Symptom Burden in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion.Frontiers in neurology · 2015Article
- Ocular motor and vestibular examination in the unconscious patient-standard of care.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We review the literature to appraise the evidence supporting or disputing the use of eye movement measurement in disorders of consciousness (DOC) with low levels of arousal or awareness, such as minimally conscious state (MCS), vegetative state (VS), and coma for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. We will focus on the effectiveness of each technique in the diagnostic classification of these patients and the gradual trend in research from manual to computerized tracking methods. New tools have become available at clinicians' disposal to assess eye movements with high spatial and temporal fidelity. The close relationship between eye movement generation and organic dysfunction in the brain allows these tools to be applied to the assessment of severe DOC as a unique supplementary toolset. We posit that eye tracking can improve clinical diagnostic precision for DOC, a key component of assessment that often dictates the course of clinical care in DOC patients. We see the emergence of long-term eye-tracking studies with seamless integration of technology in the future to improve the performance of clinical assessment in DOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.