Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25119857›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2014

A review of the role of electronic health record in genomic research.

Parasuram Krishnamoorthy, Deepansh Gupta, Saurav Chatterjee, Jessica Huston, John J Ryan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Improvement in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction with Electronic Health Records.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2016
    Article
  10. Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parasuram KrishnamoorthyDepartment of Medicine, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, NJ, USA.
Deepansh Gupta
Saurav Chatterjee
Jessica Huston
John J Ryan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR)-driven genomic research is a recent strategy used to answer research questions using EHR data linked to DNA samples. In models using EHR, after the subject's DNA is collected, a linkage between the DNA sample and the EHR data is maintained. This makes the EHR the paramount source of phenotypic information. The National Human Genome Research Institute sponsored Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network began in five sites in 2007 and was expanded to nine sites in 2012. This network has developed the methods and best practices for utilizing EHR as a tool for genomic research. Therefore, it is vital to understand the configuration of EHR used to capture data in clinical practice and feasibility of integration with clinical genetic test results. We present a detailed review of the role and importance of EHR in the field of genomic research.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsBiological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchDatabases, GeneticGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansPhenotypeGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.