ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2015
Procalcitonin as a postmortem sepsis marker. A comparison of the validity of results obtained from blood serum, aqueous humour and cerebrospinal fluid.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postmortem Blood Procalcitonin (PCT) for identifying sepsis as a cause of death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Post-mortem in situ stability of serum markers of cerebral damage and acute phase response.International journal of legal medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, serum levels of the prohormone procalcitonin have been investigated in a number of studies in relation to postmortem sepsis diagnostics, as macroscopic and histomorphological findings are, as a rule, nonspecific. However, due to advanced haemolysis, it is often not possible to determine serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels in cases of sepsis-related death. Moreover, the impact of postmortem interval on PCT levels is largely unclarified. In view of this, the present pilot study investigated PCT levels in the serum, aqueous humour, and cerebrospinal fluid in a study population of 25 persons who died of sepsis and a control population of 25 deaths unrelated to sepsis. Using the Mann-Whitney U test, statistically significant differences in PCT levels were determined for all the analysed samples from the study and control populations. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate cut-off values for sepsis diagnosis for all the sample types. Furthermore, the serum elimination rates published by Tsokos et al. (Int J Legal Med 114:237-243, 2001) were used to calculate the PCT levels at the time of death for the cases with a known postmortem interval. The results of our study demonstrate that, taking account of the postmortem elimination process, it is possible to infer the value at the time of death from the procalcitonin levels measured in all three sample types and to interpret this with the aid of a defined cut-off value. The findings need to be verified based on a larger study population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.