Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25119341›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Bystander activation and anti-tumor effects of CD8+ T cells following Interleukin-2 based immunotherapy is independent of CD4+ T cell help.

Arta M Monjazeb, Julia K Tietze, Steven K Grossenbacher, Hui-Hua Hsiao, Anthony E Zamora, Annie Mirsoian, Brent Koehn, Bruce R Blazar, Jonathan M Weiss, Robert H Wiltrout and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bystander activated CD8Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Expansion of an Unusual Virtual Memory CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arta M MonjazebDepartment of Radiation Oncology School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Julia K TietzeDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Steven K GrossenbacherDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Hui-Hua HsiaoDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Anthony E ZamoraDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Annie MirsoianDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Brent KoehnDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Bruce R BlazarDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jonathan M WeissCancer and Inflammation Program, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Robert H WiltroutCancer and Inflammation Program, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Gail D SckiselDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
William J MurphyDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
University of California, Davis · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Project 3: Humoral Targets and B Cell Biology in Chronic Graft-vs.-Host DiseaseP01CA142106 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI CUTLER, COREY S · 2009 to 2019
$17.5M
T-CELL TARGETING FOR GVHDR01HL056067 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 1995 to 2022
$5.4M
GVL TO REDUCE AML RELAPSE AFTER MURINE ALLOGENEIC BMTR01CA072669 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 1997 to 2017
$4.9M
IT by CD40 stimulation and IL2 against renal cell carcinR01CA095572 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM JOSEPH · 2002 to 2017
$4.0M
Immunophysiological Mechanisms in the Biological Therapy of CancerZIABC009262 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WILTROUT, ROBERT · 2009 to 2015
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS NIH R01 CA095572NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142106NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA072669NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095572NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL056067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that immunotherapy combining agonistic anti-CD40 and IL-2 (IT) results in synergistic anti-tumor effects. IT induces expansion of highly cytolytic, antigen-independent "bystander-activated" (CD8(+)CD44high) T cells displaying a CD25(-)NKG2D(+) phenotype in a cytokine dependent manner, which were responsible for the anti-tumor effects. While much attention has focused on CD4(+) T cell help for antigen-specific CD8(+) T cell expansion, little is known regarding the role of CD4(+) T cells in antigen-nonspecific bystander-memory CD8(+) T cell expansion. Utilizing CD4 deficient mouse models, we observed a significant expansion of bystander-memory T cells following IT which was similar to the non-CD4 depleted mice. Expanded bystander-memory CD8(+) T cells upregulated PD-1 in the absence of CD4(+) T cells which has been published as a hallmark of exhaustion and dysfunction in helpless CD8(+) T cells. Interestingly, compared to CD8(+) T cells from CD4 replete hosts, these bystander expanded cells displayed comparable (or enhanced) cytokine production, lytic ability, and in vivo anti-tumor effects suggesting no functional impairment or exhaustion and were enriched in an effector phenotype. There was no acceleration of the post-IT contraction phase of the bystander memory CD8(+) response in CD4-depleted mice. The response was independent of IL-21 signaling. These results suggest that, in contrast to antigen-specific CD8(+) T cell expansion, CD4(+) T cell help is not necessary for expansion and activation of antigen-nonspecific bystander-memory CD8(+) T cells following IT, but may play a role in regulating conversion of these cells from a central memory to effector phenotype. Additionally, the expression of PD-1 in this model appears to be a marker of effector function and not exhaustion.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCD40 AntigensCD4 AntigensCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell ProliferationCytokinesFlow CytometryImmunotherapyInterleukin-2Interleukin-21InterleukinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, ImmunologicalCD40 AntigensCD4 AntigensCytokinesInterleukin-2Interleukin-21InterleukinsPdcd1 protein, mouseProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID25119341
PMCPMC4131875
OpenAlexW2041255042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.