Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25119240›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2014

Analysis of laryngeal fractures in decomposed bodies using microfocus computed tomography (mfCT).

Mattias Kettner, Stefan Potente, Boris Schulz, Peter Knauff, Peter H Schmidt, Frank Ramsthaler

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Death by hanging: possibilities and limits of medico-legal evidence.International journal of legal medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Bony injuries in homicide cases (1994-2014). A retrospective study.International journal of legal medicine · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mattias KettnerDepartment of Experimental Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Saarland University Medical School, Kirrbergerstr. 100/Building 42, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany, Mattias.Kettner@gmx.de.
Stefan Potente
Boris Schulz
Peter Knauff
Peter H Schmidt
Frank Ramsthaler
Saarland University · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmortem computed tomography (CT) is now routinely performed in forensic autopsies. Microfocus computed tomography (mfCT) has attracted recent attention because it can provide more detailed information than routine postmortem CT can. This feasibility study evaluated the usefulness of mfCT for examination of the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage in cases of suspected strangulation, where advanced decomposition precludes detection of petechial hemorrhages and hemorrhages adjacent to fractures. The results show that mfCT was useful for identification of thin fracture lines in the fragile laryngeal structures. We suggest that mfCT should be considered for forensic autopsies in cases of suspected strangulation with advanced decomposition.

Indexed as

HomicideAsphyxiaAutopsyCause of DeathFatal OutcomeFeasibility StudiesFemaleFractures, BoneFractures, CartilageHumansHyoid BoneMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyNeck InjuriesPostmortem ChangesPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID25119240
OpenAlexW2067867120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.