Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25119138›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A comparative study of techniques for differential expression analysis on RNA-Seq data.

Zong Hong Zhang, Dhanisha J Jhaveri, Vikki M Marshall, Denis C Bauer, Janette Edson, Ramesh K Narayanan, Gregory J Robinson, Andreas E Lundberg, Perry F Bartlett, Naomi R Wray and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05378282 (Identification of Diabetic Nephropathy Biomarkers Through Transcriptomics), which is not on this map. Cited by 148 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05378282 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Identification of Diabetic Nephropathy Biomarkers Through Transcriptomics

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Juarez de MexicoRan2021 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsType 2 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes With Renal Manifestations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Metabolic differentiation of brushtail possum populations resistant and susceptible to plant toxins revealed via differential gene expression.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of Different Stocking Densities on SnailAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zong Hong ZhangThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Dhanisha J JhaveriThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Vikki M MarshallThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Denis C BauerThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; CSIRO Preventative Health Flagship and CSIRO Computational Informatics, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Janette EdsonThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; The University of Queensland, Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ramesh K NarayananThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Gregory J RobinsonThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andreas E LundbergSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Clinical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Perry F BartlettThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Naomi R WrayThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Qiong-Yi ZhaoThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technology allow high-throughput cDNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) to be widely applied in transcriptomic studies, in particular for detecting differentially expressed genes between groups. Many software packages have been developed for the identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between treatment groups based on RNA-Seq data. However, there is a lack of consensus on how to approach an optimal study design and choice of suitable software for the analysis. In this comparative study we evaluate the performance of three of the most frequently used software tools: Cufflinks-Cuffdiff2, DESeq and edgeR. A number of important parameters of RNA-Seq technology were taken into consideration, including the number of replicates, sequencing depth, and balanced vs. unbalanced sequencing depth within and between groups. We benchmarked results relative to sets of DEGs identified through either quantitative RT-PCR or microarray. We observed that edgeR performs slightly better than DESeq and Cuffdiff2 in terms of the ability to uncover true positives. Overall, DESeq or taking the intersection of DEGs from two or more tools is recommended if the number of false positives is a major concern in the study. In other circumstances, edgeR is slightly preferable for differential expression analysis at the expense of potentially introducing more false positives.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsBenchmarkingCell LineDNA, ComplementaryGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMice, Inbred C57BLReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNASequence Analysis, RNADNA, ComplementaryRNA

Identifiers

PMID25119138
PMCPMC4132098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.