Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015
Radiological outcomes of pinless navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04235283 (Comparison of the Radiographic Outcomes and Total Blood Loss Between Pinless Navigation and Conventional Method in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of the Radiographic Outcomes and Total Blood Loss Between Pinless Navigation and Conventional Method in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the radiographic outcomes and total blood loss between pinless navigation and conventional method in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Trial
- The Application of artificial intelligence in periprosthetic joint infection.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Comparison of the accuracy and efficacy of different assistive techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Navigated functional alignment total knee arthroplasty achieves reliable, reproducible and accurate results with high patient satisfaction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Arthroplasty today · 2021Article
- Pinless Navigation in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Comparison of a novel handheld accelerometer-based navigation system and conventional instrument for performing distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the accuracy of pinless navigation (BrainLAB(®) VectorVision(®) Knee 2.5 Navigation System) as an intra-operative alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The authors hypothesized that pinless navigation would reduce the proportion of outliers in conventional TKA, without a significant increase in the duration of surgery.
methodsBetween 2011 and 2012, 100 patients scheduled for a unilateral primary TKA were randomized into two groups: pinless navigation and conventional surgery. All TKAs were performed with the surgical aim of achieving neutral coronal alignment with a 180° mechanical axis. The primary outcomes of this study were post-operative radiographic assessment of lower limb alignment using hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and components placement using coronal femoral-component angle (CFA) and coronal tibia-component angle (CTA).
resultsThere was a smaller proportion of outliers for HKA, CFA and CTA at 10, 2 and 2 % respectively, in the pinless navigation group, compared to 32, 16 and 16 %, respectively, in the conventional group (p = 0.013, p = 0.032 and p = 0.032, respectively). The mean CFA was also more accurate at 90° in the pinless navigation group compared to 91° in the conventional group (p = 0.002). There was no difference in the duration of surgery between the two groups (n.s.).
conclusionsPinless navigation improves lower limb alignment and components placement without a significant increase in the duration of surgery. The authors recommend the use of pinless navigation to verify the coronal alignments of conventional cutting blocks in TKA before the bone cuts are made. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25119055What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.