ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2014
Risk factors for intraocular involvement in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful use of intravitreal rituximab as salvage therapy for relapsed vitreoretinal lymphoma.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Intraocular Lymphoma: A Review.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Review
- Reduced frequency of Intravitreal methotrexate injection lowers the risk of Keratopathy in Vitreoretinal lymphoma patients.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Intraocular lymphoma.International journal of ophthalmology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the risk factors for intraocular involvement in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), a retrospective chart review was performed on 136 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with PCNSL. The patients were investigated for demographics, clinical manifestation, and the profile of immunohistochemical tumor biomarkers, as well as for the presence of intraocular involvement of lymphoma at diagnosis or during follow-up. The mean age of the entire cohort was 58.6 ± 12.4 years, and the mean follow-up period was 31.1 ± 30.8 months. Twenty-nine (21 %) patients had an intraocular involvement, among which 20 (69 %) patients presented with intraocular involvement at diagnosis of PCNSL and 9 (31 %) patients developed intraocular involvement after a mean period of 32.4 ± 33.6 months. Of the patients with intraocular involvement, 8 (28 %) had no visual symptom at the diagnosis of ocular invasion. Between those with and without intraocular involvement, no significant differences were found with respect to the age, sex, and follow-up period as well as cerebrospinal fluid spread and bone marrow involvement. Among the immunohistochemical biomarkers, the Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly higher in patients with intraocular involvement than in patients without (P = 0.021), but the other investigated biomarkers did not show a significant difference between the two groups. A Ki-67 level ≥80 % was a risk factor for the intraocular involvement in patients with PCNSL (odds ratio, 2.63). Median overall survival was 39.0 months in the entire cohort and was not significantly different between those with and without intraocular involvement (P = 0.959).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.