Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25118875›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2014

Prevalence of Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis in vulvovaginal Candidiasis.

Jianling Li, Yingying Shan, Shangrong Fan, Xiaoping Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  2. Three cases of vulvovaginal candidiasis due toMedical mycology case reports · 2024
    Article
  3. Current medical mycology · 2024
    Review
  4. Overview on the Infections Related to RarePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jianling LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, China.
Yingying Shan
Shangrong Fan
Xiaoping Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis were isolated from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis were found in presumptive Candida glabrata isolates, which were identified using the API Candida system. We retrospectively re-examined vaginal presumptive Candida glabrata isolates for Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2012, via detection of the ITS1 region and the 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene. Among 301 presumptive Candida glabrata isolates, 293 isolates were confirmed as C. glabrata (97.34 %), 7 isolates were identified as C. nivariensis (2.33 %) and 1 isolate was identified as C. bracarensis (0.33 %). The C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis isolates were confirmed by sequencing. All C. nivariensis isolates were susceptible to nystatin and susceptible or susceptible dose-dependent to fluconazole, itraconazole, miconazole, and clotrimazole. The C. bracarensis isolate was susceptible to nystatin and the tested azoles. Among the seven patients with VVC caused by C. nivariensis and who were treated with various antifungal agents, only one patient achieved mycological eradication at both the day 7-14 and day 30-35 follow-ups. The C. bracarensis isolate was isolated from a symptomatic pregnant woman; additional data for this patient were unavailable. We conclude that C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis existed in the vaginal samples of patients with VVC. Therapeutic efficacy in the patients with C. nivariensis was poor and inconsistent with the observed in vitro antifungal susceptibility, which requires further study.

Indexed as

AdultAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasis, VulvovaginalDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFemaleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8SSequence Analysis, DNATreatment OutcomeAntifungal AgentsDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.