ArticleMycopathologia2014
Killed Saccharomyces cerevisiae protects against lethal challenge of Cryptococcus grubii.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- New antifungal strategies and drug development against WHO critical priority fungal pathogens.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Construction ofVaccines · 2023Article
- The Elusive Anti-Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Proteomic Analysis of Pathogenic Fungi Reveals Highly Expressed Conserved Cell Wall Proteins.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing Gp43 protects mice against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis infection.PloS one · 2015Article
- Role of Heat-Shock Proteins in Cellular Function and in the Biology of Fungi.Biotechnology research international · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heat-killed Saccharomyces cerevisiae (HKY) vaccination protects mice against aspergillosis, coccidioidomycosis, mucormycosis, or candidiasis. We studied HKY protection against murine cryptococcosis. Once weekly subcutaneous HKY doses (S, 6 × 10(7); 2S, 1.2 × 10(8); 3S, 2.4 × 10(8)) began 28 (×3), 35 (×4), or 42 (×6) days prior to intravenous Cryptococcus grubii infection. Survival through 28 days, and CFU in the organs of survivors, were compared to saline-vaccinated controls. In the initial experiment, S, S×4, or 2S reduced brain CFU; liver or spleen CFU was reduced by S×4 or 2S. In a more lethal second experiment, 2S×6, 2S, or 3S×4 improved survival, and HKY regimens reduced CFU in the brain, liver, or spleen, with 2S×6, 2S, or 3S×4 most efficacious. Dose size appears more important than the number of doses: Regimens >S were superior, and 2S and 2S×6 were equivalent. 2S and 3S were equivalent, suggesting doses >2S do not provide additional protection. HKY protects against Cryptococcus, supporting components of HKY as a basis for the development of a panfungal vaccine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.