Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25118643›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2014

Endoscopy in the early postoperative setting after primary gastrointestinal anastomosis.

Mahmoud A Amr, Mohammad J Alzghari, Stephanie F Polites, Mohammad A Khasawneh, David S Morris, Todd H Baron, Martin D Zielinski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of endoscopy to predict a leak after esophagectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2016
    Article
  12. Management of postoperative bleeding after laparoscopic left colectomy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahmoud A AmrDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery, Mary Brigh 2-810, St. Mary's Hospital, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Mohammad J Alzghari
Stephanie F Polites
Mohammad A Khasawneh
David S Morris
Todd H Baron
Martin D Zielinski
Mayo Clinic · USSt. Mary's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGastrointestinal anastomoses may require early evaluation and treatment via flexible endoscopic techniques when complications arise. There is reticence, however, to perform endoscopy given the applied mechanical forces. We aimed to identify the incidence of gastrointestinal anastomotic perforation or disruption resulting from endoscopy performed ≤6 weeks of anastomoses.

methodsReview of patients from 2002 to 2013 who underwent flexible endoscopy within 6 weeks of creation of gastrointestinal anastomosis. Exclusion criteria included intraoperative endoscopy, anastomotic perforation prior to endoscopy, and endoscopy remote from the anastomotic site. Data are presented as median (interquartile range; IQR) or percentages as appropriate.

resultsTwenty-four patients met our criteria (age 69 years [IQR 54-77], 54% men]). Endoscopy was performed at a median postoperative time of 18 days (IQR 8-30). Indications for endoscopy included bleeding (66%), obstruction (13%), pain (13%), concern for pancreatic duct leak (4%), and concern for ischemia (4%). Six patients underwent therapeutic endoscopic procedures including coagulation (8%), balloon dilation (8%), tube decompression (8%), and stent placement (4%). There were no anastomotic perforations or disruptions as a result of endoscopy.

conclusionDespite theoretical risks of adverse events of flexible endoscopy in the early postoperative period, no endoscopic perforations or disruptions occurred in recently created surgical anastomoses.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakColonoscopyDatabases, FactualDigestive System Surgical ProceduresEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEsophagoscopyFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25118643
OpenAlexW1997793693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.