ArticlePloS one2014
Copy number variation in Thai population.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- MYT1L: A systematic review of genetic variation encompassing schizophrenia and autism.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical delineation of 18q11-q12 microdeletion: Intellectual disability, speech and behavioral disorders, and conotruncal heart defects.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2019Trial
- Article
- Genome-wide copy number variation regions in indigenous (Bos indicus) cattle breeds of Tamil Nadu, India.Animal bioscience · 2025Article
- 2p25.3 microduplications involving MYT1L: further phenotypic characterization through an assessment of 16 new cases and a literature review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Review
- Genetic diagnosis for adult patients at a genetic clinic.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2022Article
- Article
- A comprehensive analysis of copy number variation in a Turkish dementia cohort.Human genomics · 2021Article
- CNVIntegrate: the first multi-ethnic database for identifying copy number variations associated with cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Article
- Genome-wide copy number variations in a large cohort of bantu African children.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- Identifying adaptive alleles in the human genome: from selection mapping to functional validation.Human genetics · 2021Review
- Influence ofPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021Article
- NovelFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Copy number variation (CNV) identification, interpretation, and database from Brazilian patients.Genetics and molecular biology · 2020Article
- Structural variation at the CYP2C locus: Characterization of deletion and duplication alleles.Human mutation · 2019Article
- Influence of genetic copy number variants of the human GLUT3 glucose transporter geneMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2019Article
- CD 36: Focus on Epigenetic and Post-Transcriptional Regulation.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Large-scale deletions of theJournal of lipid research · 2018Article
- Chromosomal microarray analysis in a cohort of underrepresented population identifies SERINC2 as a novel candidate gene for autism spectrum disorder.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Use of clinical chromosomal microarray in Chinese patients with autism spectrum disorder-implications of a copy number variation involvingMolecular autism · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Copy number variation (CNV) is a major genetic polymorphism contributing to genetic diversity and human evolution. Clinical application of CNVs for diagnostic purposes largely depends on sufficient population CNV data for accurate interpretation. CNVs from general population in currently available databases help classify CNVs of uncertain clinical significance, and benign CNVs. Earlier studies of CNV distribution in several populations worldwide showed that a significant fraction of CNVs are population specific. In this study, we characterized and analyzed CNVs in 3,017 unrelated Thai individuals genotyped with the Illumina Human610, Illumina HumanOmniexpress, or Illumina HapMap550v3 platform. We employed hidden Markov model and circular binary segmentation methods to identify CNVs, extracted 23,458 CNVs consistently identified by both algorithms, and cataloged these high confident CNVs into our publicly available Thai CNV database. Analysis of CNVs in the Thai population identified a median of eight autosomal CNVs per individual. Most CNVs (96.73%) did not overlap with any known chromosomal imbalance syndromes documented in the DECIPHER database. When compared with CNVs in the 11 HapMap3 populations, CNVs found in the Thai population shared several characteristics with CNVs characterized in HapMap3. Common CNVs in Thais had similar frequencies to those in the HapMap3 populations, and all high frequency CNVs (>20%) found in Thai individuals could also be identified in HapMap3. The majorities of CNVs discovered in the Thai population, however, were of low frequency, or uniquely identified in Thais. When performing hierarchical clustering using CNV frequencies, the CNV data were clustered into Africans, Europeans, and Asians, in line with the clustering performed with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. As CNV data are specific to origin of population, our population-specific reference database will serve as a valuable addition to the existing resources for the investigation of clinical significance of CNVs in Thais and related ethnicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.