Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25118253›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2014

Biotic interactions in the rhizosphere: a diverse cooperative enterprise for plant productivity.

Clelia De-la-Peña, Víctor M Loyola-Vargas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rhizosphere Microbiome Modulators: Contributions of Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria towards Sustainable Agriculture.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  17. ExposureFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clelia De-la-PeñaUnidad de Biotecnología (C.D.) and Unidad de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular de Plantas (V.M.L.-V.), Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, 97200 Merida, Yucatan, Mexico clelia@cicy.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-9489
Víctor M Loyola-VargasUnidad de Biotecnología (C.D.) and Unidad de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular de Plantas (V.M.L.-V.), Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, 97200 Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-4265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes and plants have evolved biochemical mechanisms to communicate with each other. The molecules responsible for such communication are secreted during beneficial or harmful interactions. Hundreds of these molecules secreted into the rhizosphere have been identified, and their functions are being studied in order to understand the mechanisms of interaction and communication among the different members of the rhizosphere community. The importance of root and microbe secretion to the underground habitat in improving crop productivity is increasingly recognized, with the discovery and characterization of new secreting compounds found in the rhizosphere. Different omic approaches, such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have expanded our understanding of the first signals between microbes and plants. In this review, we highlight the more recent discoveries related to molecules secreted into the rhizosphere and how they affect plant productivity, either negatively or positively. In addition, we include a survey of novel approaches to studying the rhizosphere and emerging opportunities to direct future studies.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaRhizosphereCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantMetabolomicsPlantsProteomicsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID25118253
PMCPMC4213099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.