Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25118228›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2014

Development of the PROMIS positive emotional and sensory expectancies of smoking item banks.

Joan S Tucker, William G Shadel, Maria Orlando Edelen, Brian D Stucky, Zhen Li, Mark Hansen, Li Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Psychometric Evaluation of the E-cigarette Dependence Scale.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Calibration of the Spanish PROMIS Smoking Item Banks.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The PROMIS Smoking Initiative: initial validity evidence for six new smoking item banks.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joan S TuckerRAND Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA; jtucker@rand.org.
William G ShadelRAND Health, RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA;
Maria Orlando EdelenRAND Health, RAND Corporation, Boston, MA;
Brian D StuckyRAND Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA;
Zhen LiCSE/CRESST, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Mark HansenCSE/CRESST, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Li CaiCSE/CRESST, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A SMOKING MODULE FOR PROMISR01DA026943 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI EDELEN, MARIA ORLANDO · 2009 to 2013
$2.9M
Measurement of Recovery from Drug Addiction LCR01DA030466 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CAI, LI · 2010 to 2012
$659k
NIDA NIH HHS R01DA026943NIDA NIH HHS R01DA030466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe positive emotional and sensory expectancies of cigarette smoking include improved cognitive abilities, positive affective states, and pleasurable sensorimotor sensations. This paper describes development of Positive Emotional and Sensory Expectancies of Smoking item banks that will serve to standardize the assessment of this construct among daily and nondaily cigarette smokers.

methodsData came from daily (N = 4,201) and nondaily (N =1,183) smokers who completed an online survey. To identify a unidimensional set of items, we conducted item factor analyses, item response theory analyses, and differential item functioning analyses. Additionally, we evaluated the performance of fixed-item short forms (SFs) and computer adaptive tests (CATs) to efficiently assess the construct.

resultsEighteen items were included in the item banks (15 common across daily and nondaily smokers, 1 unique to daily, 2 unique to nondaily). The item banks are strongly unidimensional, highly reliable (reliability = 0.95 for both), and perform similarly across gender, age, and race/ethnicity groups. A SF common to daily and nondaily smokers consists of 6 items (reliability = 0.86). Results from simulated CATs indicated that, on average, less than 8 items are needed to assess the construct with adequate precision using the item banks.

conclusionsThese analyses identified a new set of items that can assess the positive emotional and sensory expectancies of smoking in a reliable and standardized manner. Considerable efficiency in assessing this construct can be achieved by using the item bank SF, employing computer adaptive tests, or selecting subsets of items tailored to specific research or clinical purposes.

Indexed as

EmotionsSensationAdolescentAdultCalibrationDatabases, FactualEthnicityFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProbabilityPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID25118228
PMCPMC4189403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.