Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25117798›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2014

Progress in HIV-1 vaccine development.

Barton F Haynes, M Anthony Moody, Munir Alam, Mattia Bonsignori, Laurent Verkoczy, Guido Ferrari, Feng Gao, Georgia D Tomaras, Hua-Xin Liao, Garnett Kelsoe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CXCL13 promotes broad immune responses induced by circular RNA vaccines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current views on the potential for development of a HIV vaccine.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barton F HaynesDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Electronic address: hayne002@mc.duke.edu.
M Anthony MoodyDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Munir AlamDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Mattia BonsignoriDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Laurent VerkoczyDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Guido FerrariDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Feng GaoDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Georgia D TomarasDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Hua-Xin LiaoDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Garnett KelsoeDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Duke University · US

Funding

Virus biology scientific research support componentUM1AI100645 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCMICHAEL, ANDREW JAMES · 2012 to 2018
$204.7M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI100645NIAID NIH HHS UM1-AI100645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past 2 years have seen a number of basic and translational science advances in the quest for development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine. These advances include discovery of new envelope targets of potentially protective antibodies, demonstration that CD8(+) T cells can control HIV-1 infection, development of immunogens to overcome HIV-1 T-cell epitope diversity, identification of correlates of transmission risk in an HIV-1 efficacy trial, and mapping of the coevolution of HIV-1 founder envelope mutants in infected subjects with broad neutralizing antibodies, thereby defining broad neutralizing antibody developmental pathways. Despite these advances, a promising HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial published in 2013 did not prevent infection, and the HIV-1 vaccine field is still years away from deployment of an effective vaccine. This review summarizes what some of the scientific advances have been, what roadblocks still remain, and what the most promising approaches are for progress in design of successful HIV-1 vaccine candidates.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralB-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesClinical Trials as TopicEpitope MappingEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansImmunizationMacaca mulattaModels, MolecularViral Envelope ProteinsAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopes, T-LymphocyteViral Envelope ProteinsB cellsbroadly neutralizing antibodiesHIV-1T cellsvaccine

Identifiers

PMID25117798
PMCPMC4133697
OpenAlexW2088994809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.