Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25117750›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Progression of cardio-metabolic risk factors in subjects born small and large for gestational age.

Valentina Chiavaroli, Maria Loredana Marcovecchio, Tommaso de Giorgis, Laura Diesse, Francesco Chiarelli, Angelika Mohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Maternal Birth Weight FromJournal of pregnancy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valentina ChiavaroliDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy; Center of Excellence on Aging, "G. d'Annunzio" University Foundation, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Maria Loredana MarcovecchioDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy; Center of Excellence on Aging, "G. d'Annunzio" University Foundation, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Tommaso de GiorgisDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy; Center of Excellence on Aging, "G. d'Annunzio" University Foundation, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Laura DiesseDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Francesco ChiarelliDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy; Center of Excellence on Aging, "G. d'Annunzio" University Foundation, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Angelika MohnDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy; Center of Excellence on Aging, "G. d'Annunzio" University Foundation, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubjects born small (SGA) and large (LGA) for gestational age have an increased risk of cardio-metabolic alterations already during prepuberty. Nevertheless, the progression of their cardio-metabolic profile from childhood to adolescence has not been fully explored. Our aim was to assess potential changes in the cardio-metabolic profile from childhood to adolescence in subjects born SGA and LGA compared to those born appropriate (AGA) for gestational age.

methodsThis longitudinal study included 35 AGA, 24 SGA and 31 LGA subjects evaluated during childhood (mean age (± SD) 8.4 ± 1.4 yr) and then re-assessed during adolescence (mean age 13.3 ± 1.8 yr). BMI, blood pressure, insulin resistance (fasting insulin, HOMA-IR) and lipids were assessed. A cardio-metabolic risk z-score was applied and this consisted in calculating the sum of sex-specific z-scores for BMI, blood pressure, HOMA-IR, triglycerides and triglycerides:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.

resultsFasting insulin and HOMA-IR were higher in SGA and LGA than AGA subjects both during childhood (all P<0.01) and adolescence (all P<0.01). Similarly, the clustered cardio-metabolic risk score was higher in SGA and LGA than AGA children (both P<0.05), and these differences among groups increased during adolescence (both P<0.05). Of note, a progression of the clustered cardio-metabolic risk score was observed from childhood to adolescence within SGA and within LGA subjects (both P<0.05).

conclusionsSGA and LGA subjects showed an adverse cardio-metabolic profile during childhood when compared to AGA peers, with a worsening of this profile during adolescence. These findings indicate an overtime progression of insulin resistance and overall estimated cardiovascular risk from childhood to adolescence in SGA and LGA populations.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBirth WeightGestational AgeAdolescentBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBody Weights and MeasuresChildFemaleHumansInfant, Small for Gestational AgeInsulinItalyLipidsLongitudinal StudiesMaleBiomarkersBlood GlucoseInsulinLipids

Identifiers

PMID25117750
PMCPMC4130586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.