Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25117499›Full record

ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology

Advantages of crystallographic fragment screening: functional and mechanistic insights from a powerful platform for efficient drug discovery.

Disha Patel, Joseph D Bauman, Eddy Arnold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rapid Fragment Screening byAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Combining MicroED and native mass spectrometry for structural discovery of enzyme-small molecule complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nickel binding to c-Src SH3 domain facilitates crystallization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Structural Biology for Target Identification and Validation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Disha PatelCenter for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Joseph D BaumanCenter for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Eddy ArnoldCenter for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA. Electronic address: arnold@cabm.rutgers.edu.

Funding

ZINC FINGER-DNA COMPLEXP41RR001646 · NCRR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI CINGOLANI, GINO · 1985 to 2011
$23.8M
Project 9P50GM103368 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI ARNOLD, EDWARD · 2012 to 2016
$20.0M
Overall (pp. 40-62)P41GM103485 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CERIONE, RICHARD A. · 2012 to 2018
$15.5M
STRUCTURES OF HIV REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE WITH SUBSTRATESR37AI027690 · NIAID · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI ARNOLD, EDWARD · 1999 to 2018
$14.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001646NCRR NIH HHS RR-01646NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI027690NIAID NIH HHS R37AI027690NIGMS NIH HHS DMR-0225180NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103485NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM103368NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM103368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray crystallography has been an under-appreciated screening tool for fragment-based drug discovery due to the perception of low throughput and technical difficulty. Investigators in industry and academia have overcome these challenges by taking advantage of key factors that contribute to a successful crystallographic screening campaign. Efficient cocktail design and soaking methodologies have evolved to maximize throughput while minimizing false positives/negatives. In addition, technical improvements at synchrotron beamlines have dramatically increased data collection rates thus enabling screening on a timescale comparable to other techniques. The combination of available resources and efficient experimental design has resulted in many successful crystallographic screening campaigns. The three-dimensional crystal structure of the bound fragment complexed to its target, a direct result of the screening effort, enables structure-based drug design while revealing insights regarding protein dynamics and function not readily obtained through other experimental approaches. Furthermore, this "chemical interrogation" of the target protein crystals can lead to the identification of useful reagents for improving diffraction resolution or compound solubility.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalProteinsProteinsFragment screeningHIVInfluenzaX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID25117499
PMCPMC4501029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.