Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25116916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

SILAC-based proteomic profiling of the human MDA-MB-231 metastatic breast cancer cell line in response to the two antitumoral lactoferrin isoforms: the secreted lactoferrin and the intracellular delta-lactoferrin.

Esthelle Hoedt, Karima Chaoui, Isabelle Huvent, Christophe Mariller, Bernard Monsarrat, Odile Burlet-Schiltz, Annick Pierce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Lactoferrin as a Human Genome "Guardian"-An Overall Point of View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. The Lactoferrin Phenomenon-A Miracle Molecule.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Selenoproteins and Metastasis.Advances in cancer research · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Esthelle HoedtUGSF, UMR 8576 CNRS, USTL, IFR 147, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Karima ChaouiCNRS, IPBS (Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale), Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, UPS, IPBS, Toulouse, France.
Isabelle HuventUGSF, UMR 8576 CNRS, USTL, IFR 147, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Christophe MarillerUGSF, UMR 8576 CNRS, USTL, IFR 147, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Bernard MonsarratCNRS, IPBS (Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale), Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, UPS, IPBS, Toulouse, France.
Odile Burlet-SchiltzCNRS, IPBS (Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale), Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, UPS, IPBS, Toulouse, France.
Annick PierceUGSF, UMR 8576 CNRS, USTL, IFR 147, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale · FRUnité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLactoferrins exhibit antitumoral activities either as a secretory lactoferrin or an intracellular delta-lactoferrin isoform. These activities involve processes such as regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis. While lactoferrin has been shown to exert its function by activating different transduction pathways, delta-lactoferrin has been proven to act as a transcription factor. Like many tumor suppressors, these two proteins are under-expressed in several types of cancer, particularly in breast cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn order to compare the differential effects of the re-introduction of lactoferrin isoforms in breast cancer cells we chose the cancerous mammary gland MDA-MB-231 cell line as a model. We produced a cell line stably expressing delta-lactoferrin. We also treated these cells with fresh purified human breast lactoferrin. We performed two quantitative proteomic studies in parallel using SILAC coupled to mass spectrometry in order to compare the effects of different doses of the two lactoferrin isoforms. The proteome of untreated, delta-lactoferrin expressing and human lactoferrin treated MDA-MB-231 cells were compared. Overall, around 5300 proteins were identified and quantified using the in-house developed MFPaQ software. Among these, expression was increased by 1.5-fold or more for around 300 proteins in delta-lactoferrin expressing cells and 190 proteins in lactoferrin treated cells. At the same time, about 200 and 40 proteins were found to be downregulated (0-0.7-fold) in response to delta-lactoferrin and lactoferrin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Re-introduction of delta-lactoferrin and lactoferrin expression in MDA-MB-231 mainly leads to modifications of protein profiles involved in processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, oxidative stress, the ubiquitin pathway, translation and mRNA quality control. Moreover, this study identified new target genes of delta-lactoferrin transcriptional activity such as SelH, GTF2F2 and UBE2E1.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAlternative SplicingBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIsotope LabelingLactoferrinNeoplasm MetastasisPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingProtein IsoformsProteomeRecombinant ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsLactoferrinProtein IsoformsProteomeRecombinant ProteinsSelenoproteinsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors, TFIItranscription factor TFIIFUBE2E1 protein, humanUbiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID25116916
PMCPMC4130549
OpenAlexW2043399982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.