Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25116890›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2014

A bioenergetic basis for membrane divergence in archaea and bacteria.

Víctor Sojo, Andrew Pomiankowski, Nick Lane

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Diffusion-controlled growth of a planar chemical garden wall before osmotic fracture.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. The Archaeal Cell Cycle.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The limits of metabolic heredity in protocells.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The "Water Problem"(Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Víctor SojoDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom; CoMPLEX, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew PomiankowskiDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom; CoMPLEX, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nick LaneDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom; CoMPLEX, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane bioenergetics are universal, yet the phospholipid membranes of archaea and bacteria-the deepest branches in the tree of life-are fundamentally different. This deep divergence in membrane chemistry is reflected in other stark differences between the two domains, including ion pumping and DNA replication. We resolve this paradox by considering the energy requirements of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA). We develop a mathematical model based on the premise that LUCA depended on natural proton gradients. Our analysis shows that such gradients can power carbon and energy metabolism, but only in leaky cells with a proton permeability equivalent to fatty acid vesicles. Membranes with lower permeability (equivalent to modern phospholipids) collapse free-energy availability, precluding exploitation of natural gradients. Pumping protons across leaky membranes offers no advantage, even when permeability is decreased 1,000-fold. We hypothesize that a sodium-proton antiporter (SPAP) provided the first step towards modern membranes. SPAP increases the free energy available from natural proton gradients by ∼60%, enabling survival in 50-fold lower gradients, thereby facilitating ecological spread and divergence. Critically, SPAP also provides a steadily amplifying advantage to proton pumping as membrane permeability falls, for the first time favoring the evolution of ion-tight phospholipid membranes. The phospholipids of archaea and bacteria incorporate different stereoisomers of glycerol phosphate. We conclude that the enzymes involved took these alternatives by chance in independent populations that had already evolved distinct ion pumps. Our model offers a quantitatively robust explanation for why membrane bioenergetics are universal, yet ion pumps and phospholipid membranes arose later and independently in separate populations. Our findings elucidate the paradox that archaea and bacteria share DNA transcription, ribosomal translation, and ATP synthase, yet differ in equally fundamental traits that depend on the membrane, including DNA replication.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismArchaeaBacteriaCell MembraneCell Membrane PermeabilityIon TransportMembrane LipidsModels, BiologicalProton PumpsProtonsSodiumSodium-Hydrogen ExchangersThermodynamicsMembrane LipidsProton PumpsProtonsSodiumSodium-Hydrogen Exchangers

Identifiers

PMID25116890
PMCPMC4130499
OpenAlexW2049683776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.