Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25116885›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2014

Encapsulated cells expressing a chemotherapeutic activating enzyme allow the targeting of subtoxic chemotherapy and are safe and efficacious: data from two clinical trials in pancreatic cancer.

J Matthias Löhr, Stephan L Haas, Jens C Kröger, Helmut M Friess, Raimund Höft, Peter E Goretzki, Christian Peschel, Markus Schweigert, Brian Salmons, Walter H Gunzburg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stem Cell's Secretome Delivery Systems.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Prodrugs and prodrug-activated systems in gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gene Therapy for Pancreatic Diseases: Current Status.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  10. Gene Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Specificity, Issues and Hopes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

J Matthias LöhrGastrocentrum, Karolinska University Hospital, Hälsovägen 1, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden. matthias.lohr@ki.se.
Stephan L HaasGastrocentrum, Karolinska University Hospital, Hälsovägen 1, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden. St.Haas@gmx.de.
Jens C KrögerInstitute of Diagnostic und Interventional Radiology, University Medicine Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Strasse 6, D-18057 Rostock, Germany. jens-christian.kroeger@med.uni-rostock.de.
Helmut M FriessDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany. helmut@friess.cc.
Raimund HöftAbteilung für Gastroenterologie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, Universität Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Strasse 6, D-18057 Rostock, Germany. Raimund.Hoeft@med.uni-rostock.de.
Peter E GoretzkiChirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Medizinische Einrichtungen der Heinrich Heine Universität, Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. pgoretzki@lukasneuss.de.
Christian PeschelMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München III, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany. christian.peschel@lrz.tu-muenchen.de.
Markus SchweigertMedizinische Klinik (Onkologie/Hämatologie) Campus Mitte, Universitätsklinikum Charité II, Schumannstrasse 21/22, D-10098 Berlin, Germany. info@onkologie-hellersdorf.de.
Brian SalmonsAustrianova Singapore Pte Ltd, Centros, Biopolis, Singapore. salmons@sgaustria.com.
Walter H GunzburgAustrianova Singapore Pte Ltd, Centros, Biopolis, Singapore. gunzburg@sgaustria.com.
Universitätsmedizin Rostock · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEKarolinska University Hospital · SEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, there is still a need for improved therapies. In this manuscript, we report clinical experience with a new therapy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer involving the implantation of encapsulated cells over-expressing a cytochrome P450 enzyme followed by subsequent low-dose ifosfamide administrations as a means to target activated ifosfamide to the tumor. The safety and efficacy of the angiographic instillation of encapsulated allogeneic cells overexpressing cytochrome P450 in combination with low-dose systemic ifosfamide administration has now been evaluated in 27 patients in total. These patients were successfully treated in four centers by three different interventional radiologists, arguing strongly that the treatment can be successfully used in different centers. The safety of the intra-arterial delivery of the capsules and the lack of evidence that the patients developed an inflammatory or immune response to the encapsulated cells or encapsulation material was shown in all 27 patients. The ifosfamide dose of 1 g/m2/day used in the first trial was well tolerated by all patients. In contrast, the ifosfamide dose of 2 g/m2/day used in the second trial was poorly tolerated in most patients. Since the median survival in the first trial was 40 weeks and only 33 weeks in the second trial, this strongly suggests that there is no survival benefit to increasing the dose of ifosfamide, and indeed, a lower dose is beneficial for quality of life and the lack of side effects. This is supported by the one-year survival rate in the first trial being 38%, whilst that in the second trial was only 23%. However, taking the data from both trials together, a total of nine of the 27 patients were alive after one year, and two of these nine patients were alive for two years or more.

Identifiers

PMID25116885
PMCPMC4190529
OpenAlexW2166173905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.