Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25116792›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2014

Long-range chemical sensitivity in the sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectra of substituted thiophenes.

Graham N George, Mark J Hackett, Michael Sansone, Martin L Gorbaty, Simon R Kelemen, Roger C Prince, Hugh H Harris, Ingrid J Pickering

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Graham N GeorgeMolecular and Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada.
Mark J Hackett
Michael Sansone
Martin L Gorbaty
Simon R Kelemen
Roger C Prince
Hugh H Harris
Ingrid J Pickering
ExxonMobil (United States) · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) pp.711-759P41GM103393 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HODGSON, KEITH O · 2012 to 2019
$30.6M
CIHRNIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103393NIGMS NIH HHS P41GM103393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thiophenes are the simplest aromatic sulfur-containing compounds and are stable and widespread in fossil fuels. Regulation of sulfur levels in fuels and emissions has become and continues to be ever more stringent as part of governments' efforts to address negative environmental impacts of sulfur dioxide. In turn, more effective removal methods are continually being sought. In a chemical sense, thiophenes are somewhat obdurate and hence their removal from fossil fuels poses problems for the industrial chemist. Sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy provides key information on thiophenic components in fuels. Here we present a systematic study of the spectroscopic sensitivity to chemical modifications of the thiophene system. We conclude that while the utility of sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectra in understanding the chemical composition of sulfur-containing fossil fuels has already been demonstrated, care must be exercised in interpreting these spectra because the assumption of an invariant spectrum for thiophenic forms may not always be valid.

Indexed as

Fossil FuelsModels, MolecularMolecular StructurePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsSulfurSulfur DioxideThiophenesX-Ray Absorption SpectroscopyFossil FuelsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsSulfurSulfur DioxideThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID25116792
PMCPMC4161161
OpenAlexW2086247815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.