ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2014
Experiences with E-learning in Ophthalmology.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of an Instructional Video and Simulation Model for Teaching Slit Lamp Examination to Medical Students.Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) · 2023Article
- E-learning for Ophthalmology Training Continuity During COVID-19 Pandemic: Satisfaction of residents of Hédi Raies Institut of Ophthalmology of Tunis.La Tunisie medicale · 2021Article
- Flipped ophthalmology classroom augmented with case-based learning.Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO · 2021Article
- Perception and experience of academic Jordanian ophthalmologists with E-Learning for undergraduate course during the COVID-19 pandemic.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020Article
- Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.Computers & education · 2020Article
- Author's reply.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2015Article
- Comment on student-teacher research: a dilemma between power, ethics, and morality.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2015Article
- E-learning in ophthalmology: where next?Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2014Article
- A virtual COVID-19 ophthalmology rotation.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byAuthor's reply.2015
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionE-learning is the use of internet for the purpose of education. E-learning in medical education is at a nascent stage in our country. The present study was carried out with the purpose of introducing e-learning to third year medical students in the subject of Ophthalmology and taking feedback on their attitude towards the new methodology of teaching and evaluating. MATERIALS AND
methodsE-learning was introduced to the seventh semester students of MBBS in the subject of Ophthalmology. The topics were converted to web friendly format and used for teaching and evaluating. Feedback was taken from the students on completion of the term on their attitudes towards e-learning and their views on the scope of e-learning in medical education.
resultsAll the students agreed on the usefulness of e-learning in medical education. Eleven students (27.5%) found the medium of e-learning to be interesting, 15 (37.5%) considered it to be easy and accessible, 10 (25%) found it to be fast and easy, 4 (10%) considered it to be a medium which can give updated information. Twenty-three (57.5%) students considered that e-learning should be a medium of instruction in all the subjects, 15 (37.5%) students considered its usefulness in clinical subjects only. Twenty-eight students (70%) desired that e-learning should be used to provide important notes, questions, MCQs on all topics.
conclusionsE-learning is well accepted as a medium of instruction by medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.