Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25116455›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Can training in advanced clinical skills in obstetrics, neonatal care and leadership, of non-physician clinicians in Malawi impact on clinical services improvements (the ETATMBA project): a process evaluation.

David R Ellard, Wanangwa Chimwaza, David Davies, Joseph Paul O'Hare, Francis Kamwendo, Siobhan Quenby, Frances Griffiths, ETATMBA Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David R EllardWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Wanangwa ChimwazaCollege of Medicine, Malawi University, Blantyre, Malawi.
David DaviesEducational Development & Research Team, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Joseph Paul O'HareDivision of Metabolic & Vascular Health, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Francis KamwendoObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Malawi University, College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Siobhan QuenbyDivision of Reproductive Health, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Frances GriffithsDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
ETATMBA Study Group
University of Warwick · GBUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe 'enhancing human resources and the use of appropriate technologies for maternal and perinatal survival in sub-Saharan Africa' (ETATMBA) project is training emergency obstetric and new-born care (EmONC) non-physician clinicians (NPCs) as advanced clinical leaders. Our objectives were to evaluate the implementation and changes to practice.

designA mixed methods process evaluation with the predominate methodology being qualitative.

settingRural and urban hospitals in 8 of the 14 districts of northern and central Malawi.

participants54 EmONC NPCs with 3 years' plus experience.

interventionTraining designed and delivered by clinicians from the UK and Malawi; it is a 2-year plus package of training (classroom, mentorship and assignments).

resultsWe conducted 79 trainee interviews over three time points during the training, as well as a convenience sample of 10 colleagues, 7 district officers and 2 UK obstetricians. Trainees worked in a context of substantial variation in the rates of maternal and neonatal deaths between districts. Training reached trainees working across the target regions. For 46 trainees (8 dropped out of the course), dose delivered in terms of attendance was high and all 46 spent time working alongside an obstetrician. In early interviews trainees recalled course content unprompted indicating training had been received. Colleagues and district officers reported cascading of knowledge and initial changes in practice indicating early implementation. By asking trainees to describe actual cases we found they had implemented new knowledge and skills. These included life-saving interventions for postpartum haemorrhage and eclampsia. Trainees identified the leadership training as enabling them to confidently change their own practice and initiate change in their health facility.

conclusionsThis process evaluation suggests that trainees have made positive changes in their practice. Clear impacts on maternal and perinatal mortality are yet to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceQuality ImprovementAllied Health PersonnelDelivery of Health CareFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornLeadershipMalawiMaternal DeathMidwiferyObstetricsPerinatal CarePerinatal DeathPhysiciansleadershipMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGNon-physician cliniciansOBSTETRICStask shifting

Identifiers

PMID25116455
PMCPMC4139632
OpenAlexW2106401193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.