Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25116146›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A simple repeat polymorphism in the MITF-M promoter is a key regulator of white spotting in dogs.

Izabella Baranowska Körberg, Elisabeth Sundström, Jennifer R S Meadows, Gerli Rosengren Pielberg, Ulla Gustafson, Åke Hedhammar, Elinor K Karlsson, Jennifer Seddon, Arne Söderberg, Carles Vilà and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic testing predicts appearance but not behavior in dogs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neural crest cells as a source of microevolutionary variation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Izabella Baranowska KörbergDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elisabeth SundströmScience for Life Laboratory Uppsala, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jennifer R S MeadowsScience for Life Laboratory Uppsala, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gerli Rosengren PielbergScience for Life Laboratory Uppsala, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulla GustafsonDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Åke HedhammarDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elinor K KarlssonBroad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; FAS Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jennifer SeddonScience for Life Laboratory Uppsala, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.
Arne SöderbergDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Disease, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Carles VilàConservation and Evolutionary Genetics Group, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain.
Xiaolan ZhangBroad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mikael ÅkessonGrimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
Kerstin Lindblad-TohScience for Life Laboratory Uppsala, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Göran AnderssonDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Leif AnderssonDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEBroad Institute · USUppsala University · SECenter for Systems Biology · USEstación Biológica de Doñana · ESScience for Life Laboratory · SESwedish Veterinary Agency · SEUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The white spotting locus (S) in dogs is colocalized with the MITF (microphtalmia-associated transcription factor) gene. The phenotypic effects of the four S alleles range from solid colour (S) to extreme white spotting (s(w)). We have investigated four candidate mutations associated with the s(w) allele, a SINE insertion, a SNP at a conserved site and a simple repeat polymorphism all associated with the MITF-M promoter as well as a 12 base pair deletion in exon 1B. The variants associated with white spotting at all four loci were also found among wolves and we conclude that none of these could be a sole causal mutation, at least not for extreme white spotting. We propose that the three canine white spotting alleles are not caused by three independent mutations but represent haplotype effects due to different combinations of causal polymorphisms. The simple repeat polymorphism showed extensive diversity both in dogs and wolves, and allele-sharing was common between wolves and white spotted dogs but was non-existent between solid and spotted dogs as well as between wolves and solid dogs. This finding was unexpected as Solid is assumed to be the wild-type allele. The data indicate that the simple repeat polymorphism has been a target for selection during dog domestication and breed formation. We also evaluated the significance of the three MITF-M associated polymorphisms with a Luciferase assay, and found conclusive evidence that the simple repeat polymorphism affects promoter activity. Three alleles associated with white spotting gave consistently lower promoter activity compared with the allele associated with solid colour. We propose that the simple repeat polymorphism affects cooperativity between transcription factors binding on either flanking sides of the repeat. Thus, both genetic and functional evidence show that the simple repeat polymorphism is a key regulator of white spotting in dogs.

Indexed as

Microsatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociAllelesAnimalsCanadaDogsEuropeGene FrequencyGenetic VariationGenotypeHair ColorHaplotypesMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID25116146
PMCPMC4130573
OpenAlexW2141522719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.