Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25115892›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015

Antiemetic therapy in Asia Pacific countries for patients receiving moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy--a descriptive analysis of practice patterns, antiemetic quality of care, and use of antiemetic guidelines.

Shiying Yu, Thomas A Burke, Alexandre Chan, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Ruey Kuen Hsieh, Xichun Hu, Jin-Tung Liang, Ana Baños, Carmel Spiteri, Dorothy M K Keefe

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outcomes of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting guideline adherence in pediatric and adult patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. 2016 Updated MASCC/ESMO Consensus Recommendations: Controlling nausea and vomiting with chemotherapy of low or minimal emetic potential.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Adherence to antiemetic guidelines in solid cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy in Korea.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  9. A retrospective study on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in highly/moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: incidence and prescribing practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Gaps exist between patients' experience and clinicians' awareness of symptoms after chemotherapy: CINV and accompanying symptoms.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea requires further improvement: symptom experience and risk factors among Korean patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  17. Patterns of antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in China.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of CINV in earlier cycles on CINV and chemotherapy regimen modification in subsequent cycles in Asia Pacific clinical practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Shiying YuCancer Center of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Thomas A Burke
Alexandre Chan
Hoon-Kyo Kim
Ruey Kuen Hsieh
Xichun Hu
Jin-Tung Liang
Ana Baños
Carmel Spiteri
Dorothy M K Keefe
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USMSD (Australia) · AUNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNSt. Vincent's Hospital · KRTongji Hospital · CNUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis paper reports prescribing patterns for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) after highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer in six Asia Pacific countries.

methodsIn a prospective noninterventional study, 31 sites in Australia, China, India, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan recorded details of CINV prophylaxis for the acute phase (first 24 h) and delayed phase (days 2-5) after single-day HEC or MEC for adult patients. Additional information on CINV prophylactic medications was collected from 6-day patient diaries. Primary antiemetic therapies were defined as corticosteroids, the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (5HT3-RAs), and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1-RAs).

resultsEvaluable patients in cycle 1 numbered 648 (318 [49%] HEC and 330 [51%] MEC) of mean (SD) age of 56 (12) years, including 58% women. For the acute phase after HEC, overall (and country range), 96% (91-100%) of patients received a 5HT3-RA, 87% (70-100%) a corticosteroid, and 43% (0-91%) an NK1-RA. CINV prophylaxis for the HEC delayed phase was more variable: including 22% (7-65%) 5HT3-RA, 52% (12-93%) corticosteroid, and 46% (0-88%) NK1-RA. For the MEC acute phase, 97% (87-100%) of patients received 5HT3-RA and 86% (73-97%) a corticosteroid. For the MEC delayed phase, 201 patients (61%) received a primary antiemetic, including 5HT3-RA (41%), corticosteroid (37%), and/or NK1-RA (4%).

conclusionsThe 5HT3-RAs were prescribed consistently in all countries, while prescribing of other antiemetic therapies was variable, and corticosteroids were under-prescribed for CINV prophylaxis, particularly in the delayed phase.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Adrenal Cortex HormonesAgedAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsAsiaClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNauseaNeoplasmsNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsPatientsPractice Guidelines as TopicAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsSerotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID25115892
OpenAlexW2072071851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.