Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25115559›Full record

ArticlePlanta2014

Cotyledonary somatic embryos of Pinus pinaster Ait. most closely resemble fresh, maturing cotyledonary zygotic embryos: biological, carbohydrate and proteomic analyses.

Alexandre Morel, Jean-François Trontin, Françoise Corbineau, Anne-Marie Lomenech, Martine Beaufour, Isabelle Reymond, Claire Le Metté, Kevin Ader, Luc Harvengt, Martine Cadene and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A transcriptome atlas of zygotic and somatic embryogenesis in Norway spruce.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Proteomic Profiling ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Constitutive Overexpression of a ConiferFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Proteome-Wide Analysis of Heat-Stress inFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Somatic Embryogenesis in Selected Conifer TreesFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexandre MorelINRA, UR 0588 Unité Amélioration, Génétique et Physiologie Forestières, 2163 Avenue de la Pomme de Pin, CS 4001, Ardon, 45075, Orléans Cedex 2, France.
Jean-François Trontin
Françoise Corbineau
Anne-Marie Lomenech
Martine Beaufour
Isabelle Reymond
Claire Le Metté
Kevin Ader
Luc Harvengt
Martine Cadene
Philippe Label
Caroline Teyssier
Marie-Anne Lelu-Walter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cotyledonary somatic embryos (SEs) of maritime pine are routinely matured for 12 weeks before being germinated and converted to plantlets. Although regeneration success is highly dependent on SEs quality, the date of harvesting is currently determined mainly on the basis of morphological features. This empirical method does not provide any accurate information about embryo quality with respect to storage compounds (proteins, carbohydrates). We first analyzed SEs matured for 10, 12 and 14 weeks by carrying out biological (dry weight, water content) and biochemical measurements (total protein and carbohydrate contents). No difference could be found between collection dates, suggesting that harvesting SEs after 12 weeks is appropriate. Cotyledonary SEs were then compared to various stages, from fresh to fully desiccated, in the development of cotyledonary zygotic embryos (ZEs). We identified profiles that were similar using hierarchical ascendant cluster analysis (HCA). Fresh and dehydrated ZEs could be distinguished, and SEs clustered with fresh ZEs. Both types of embryo exhibited similar carbohydrate and protein contents and signatures. This high level of similarity (94.5 %) was further supported by proteome profiling. Highly expressed proteins included storage, stress-related, late embryogenesis abundant and energy metabolism proteins. By comparing overexpressed proteins in developing and cotyledonary SEs or ZEs, some (23 proteins) could be identified as candidate biomarkers for the late, cotyledonary stage. This is the first report of useful generic protein markers for monitoring embryo development in maritime pine. Our results also suggest that improvements of SEs quality may be achieved if the current maturation conditions are refined.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCarbohydratesCluster AnalysisCotyledonElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFructoseGlucoseMaltosePinusPlant ProteinsProteomeProteomicsSeedsSucroseTime FactorsBiomarkersCarbohydratesFructoseGlucoseMaltosePlant ProteinsProteomeSucroseWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.