ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2014
Challenges to the early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in developing countries.
Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
204 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 5-year survival rate and determinants of decreased survival among patients with breast cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2026Pooled it
- Factors Influencing Patient and System Delays in Women with Breast Cancer in Morocco: A Systematic Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- Utility of CA-125 for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of public health interventions to address breast cancer inequalities in low- and middle-income countries.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Advanced-stage breast cancer diagnosis and its determinants in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2024Pooled it
- Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Breast Cancer Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Health system barriers influencing timely breast cancer diagnosis and treatment among women in low and middle-income Asian countries: evidence from a mixed-methods systematic review.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- The patient, diagnostic, and treatment intervals in adult patients with cancer from high- and lower-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy have a Better Survival than Mastectomy? A Meta-Analysis of More than 1,500,000 Patients.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Health system factors that influence diagnostic and treatment intervals in women with breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2021Pooled it
- Delays and Barriers to Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.The oncologist · 2019Pooled it
- Breast cancer screening in developing countries.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2017Pooled it
- Level of Awareness and Knowledge of Breast Cancer in Nigeria. A Systematic Review.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2017Pooled it
- Explaining disparities in oncology health systems delays and stage at diagnosis between men and women in Botswana: A cohort study.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Determinants of stage at breast cancer diagnosis across different healthcare systems: an international multicentre cohort study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Paving the way for more accessible cancer care in low-income countries with optimization.Health care management science · 2026Article
- Referral delays in metastatic breast cancer care: barriers and facilitators across a fragmented pathway.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer Risk Factors Analysis in Middle-Aged Women: Evidence From a Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Awareness and Practice in Breast Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This critical review of the literature assembles and compares available data on breast cancer clinical stage, time intervals to care, and access barriers in different countries. It provides evidence that while more than 70% of breast cancer patients in most high-income countries are diagnosed in stages I and II, only 20%-50% patients in the majority of low- and middle-income countries are diagnosed in these earlier stages. Most studies in the developed world show an association between an advanced clinical stage of breast cancer and delays greater than three months between symptom discovery and treatment start. The evidence assembled in this review shows that the median of this interval is 30-48 d in high-income countries but 3-8 mo in low- and middle-income countries. The longest delays occur between the first medical consultation and the beginning of treatment, known as the provider interval. The little available evidence suggests that access barriers and quality deficiencies in cancer care are determinants of provider delay in low- and middle-income countries. Research on specific access barriers and deficiencies in quality of care for the early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer is practically non-existent in these countries, where it is the most needed for the design of cost-effective public policies that strengthen health systems to tackle this expensive and deadly disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.