Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25114662›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2014

Validation of a blood protein signature for non-small cell lung cancer.

Michael R Mehan, Stephen A Williams, Jill M Siegfried, William L Bigbee, Joel L Weissfeld, David O Wilson, Harvey I Pass, William N Rom, Thomas Muley, Michael Meister and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. External Validation of Plasma Glycosaminoglycans as Biomarkers to Improve Lung Cancer Risk Stratification.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael R MehanSomaLogic, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
Stephen A WilliamsSomaLogic, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
Jill M SiegfriedUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
William L BigbeeUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joel L WeissfeldDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
David O WilsonUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Harvey I PassLangone Medical Center and Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
William N RomNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas MuleyThoraxklinik at University Hospital Heidelberg and Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael MeisterThoraxklinik at University Hospital Heidelberg and Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Wilbur FranklinUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
York E MillerUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA ; Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Edward N BrodySomaLogic, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
Rachel M OstroffSomaLogic, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
SomaLogic (United States) · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USGerman Center for Lung Research · DENew York University · USNYU Langone Health · USUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Minnesota · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tissue Bank and Biomarkers CoreP50CA058187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MILLER, YORK E · 1992 to 2018
$43.8M
Vitamin D3 Modulation of Inflammation and Lung Cancer RiskP50CA090440 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DACIC, SANJA · 2001 to 2015
$34.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058187NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCT screening for lung cancer is effective in reducing mortality, but there are areas of concern, including a positive predictive value of 4% and development of interval cancers. A blood test that could manage these limitations would be useful, but development of such tests has been impaired by variations in blood collection that may lead to poor reproducibility across populations.

resultsBlood-based proteomic profiles were generated with SOMAscan technology, which measured 1033 proteins. First, preanalytic variability was evaluated with Sample Mapping Vectors (SMV), which are panels of proteins that detect confounders in protein levels related to sample collection. A subset of well collected serum samples not influenced by preanalytic variability was selected for discovery of lung cancer biomarkers. The impact of sample collection variation on these candidate markers was tested in the subset of samples with higher SMV scores so that the most robust markers could be used to create disease classifiers. The discovery sample set (n = 363) was from a multi-center study of 94 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and 269 long-term smokers and benign pulmonary nodule controls. The analysis resulted in a 7-marker panel with an AUC of 0.85 for all cases (68% adenocarcinoma, 32% squamous) and an AUC of 0.93 for squamous cell carcinoma in particular. This panel was validated by making blinded predictions in two independent cohorts (n = 138 in the first validation and n = 135 in the second). The model was recalibrated for a panel format prior to unblinding the second cohort. The AUCs overall were 0.81 and 0.77, and for squamous cell tumors alone were 0.89 and 0.87. The estimated negative predictive value for a 15% disease prevalence was 93% overall and 99% for squamous lung tumors. The proteins in the classifier function in destruction of the extracellular matrix, metabolic homeostasis and inflammation.

conclusionsSelecting biomarkers resistant to sample processing variation led to robust lung cancer biomarkers that performed consistently in independent validations. They form a sensitive signature for detection of lung cancer, especially squamous cell histology. This non-invasive test could be used to improve the positive predictive value of CT screening, with the potential to avoid invasive evaluation of nonmalignant pulmonary nodules.

Indexed as

BiomarkerDiagnosisLung cancerPreanalytic variabilityProteomicSample biasSOMAmerSquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID25114662
PMCPMC4123246
OpenAlexW2146618353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.