ArticleClinical proteomics2014
Validation of a blood protein signature for non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Performance of the AptoDetect™-Lung Biomarker for Lung Cancer in a High-Risk Korean Population: A Multicenter Prospective Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based proteogenomic data modeling identifies circulating plasma biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Prospective proteomics for discovering biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma: a literature review.Translational cancer research · 2025Review
- External Validation of Plasma Glycosaminoglycans as Biomarkers to Improve Lung Cancer Risk Stratification.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Identification of a Biomarker Panel in Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Through Proteomic Analysis and Machine Learning.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Article
- CSF Proteomics in Patients With Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.Neurology · 2024Article
- Description of an activity-based enzyme biosensor for lung cancer detection.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Systemic Markers of Lung Function and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Decline across Diverse Cohorts.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
- Comprehensive proteomics and platform validation of urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer diagnosis and staging.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- High-Multiplex Aptamer-Based Serum Proteomics to Identify Candidate Serum Biomarkers of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2023Article
- The Impact of Lung Cancer in Patients with Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema (CPFE).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Liquid Biopsy for Lung Cancer: Up-to-Date and Perspectives for Screening Programs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Identification of serum biomarkers for necrotizing enterocolitis using aptamer-based proteomics.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Proteomics Profiling Reveals Circulating Biomarkers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Circulation. Heart failure · 2021Article
- Comprehensive aptamer-based screen of 1317 proteins uncovers improved stool protein markers of colorectal cancer.Journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Predicting disease course in ulcerative colitis using stool proteins identified through an aptamer-based screen.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Clinical proteomics for prostate cancer: understanding prostate cancer pathology and protein biomarkers for improved disease management.Clinical proteomics · 2020Review
- Chemical Modification of Aptamers for Increased Binding Affinity in Diagnostic Applications: Current Status and Future Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Proteomic insights on the metabolism in inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCT screening for lung cancer is effective in reducing mortality, but there are areas of concern, including a positive predictive value of 4% and development of interval cancers. A blood test that could manage these limitations would be useful, but development of such tests has been impaired by variations in blood collection that may lead to poor reproducibility across populations.
resultsBlood-based proteomic profiles were generated with SOMAscan technology, which measured 1033 proteins. First, preanalytic variability was evaluated with Sample Mapping Vectors (SMV), which are panels of proteins that detect confounders in protein levels related to sample collection. A subset of well collected serum samples not influenced by preanalytic variability was selected for discovery of lung cancer biomarkers. The impact of sample collection variation on these candidate markers was tested in the subset of samples with higher SMV scores so that the most robust markers could be used to create disease classifiers. The discovery sample set (n = 363) was from a multi-center study of 94 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and 269 long-term smokers and benign pulmonary nodule controls. The analysis resulted in a 7-marker panel with an AUC of 0.85 for all cases (68% adenocarcinoma, 32% squamous) and an AUC of 0.93 for squamous cell carcinoma in particular. This panel was validated by making blinded predictions in two independent cohorts (n = 138 in the first validation and n = 135 in the second). The model was recalibrated for a panel format prior to unblinding the second cohort. The AUCs overall were 0.81 and 0.77, and for squamous cell tumors alone were 0.89 and 0.87. The estimated negative predictive value for a 15% disease prevalence was 93% overall and 99% for squamous lung tumors. The proteins in the classifier function in destruction of the extracellular matrix, metabolic homeostasis and inflammation.
conclusionsSelecting biomarkers resistant to sample processing variation led to robust lung cancer biomarkers that performed consistently in independent validations. They form a sensitive signature for detection of lung cancer, especially squamous cell histology. This non-invasive test could be used to improve the positive predictive value of CT screening, with the potential to avoid invasive evaluation of nonmalignant pulmonary nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.