Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25114513›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2014

Medication adherence: process for implementation.

Phil Mendys, Leah L Zullig, Rebecca Burkholder, Bradi B Granger, Hayden B Bosworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Community Pharmacy-Based Adherence Programs and the Role of Pharmacy Technicians: A Review.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Phil MendysPfizer Inc, Medical Affairs, New York, NY, USA ; Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Leah L ZulligCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Rebecca BurkholderNational Consumers League, Washington, DC, USA.
Bradi B GrangerSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Hayden B BosworthCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA ; School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Medicine and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX001345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving medication adherence is a critically important, but often enigmatic objective of patients, providers, and the overall health care system. Increasing medication adherence has the potential to reduce health care costs while improving care quality, patient satisfaction and health outcomes. While there are a number of papers that describe the benefits of medication adherence in terms of cost, safety, outcomes, or quality of life, there are limited reviews that consider how best to seamlessly integrate tools and processes directed at improving medication adherence. We will address processes for implementing medication adherence interventions with the goal of better informing providers and health care systems regarding the safe and effective use of medications.

Indexed as

health care systemsmedication adherencepatient educationpharmacypolicyself-management

Identifiers

PMID25114513
PMCPMC4122551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.