Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25114239›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Hybrid biosynthetic gene therapy vector development and dual engineering capacity.

Charles H Jones, Anitha Ravikrishnan, Mingfu Chen, Ryan Reddinger, Mahmoud Kamal Ahmadi, Snehal Rane, Anders P Hakansson, Blaine A Pfeifer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Enhancing vaccine effectiveness with delivery technology.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charles H JonesDepartments of Chemical and Biological Engineering and.
Anitha RavikrishnanDepartments of Chemical and Biological Engineering and.
Mingfu ChenDepartments of Chemical and Biological Engineering and.
Ryan ReddingerMicrobiology and Immunology, and.
Mahmoud Kamal AhmadiDepartments of Chemical and Biological Engineering and.
Snehal RaneDepartments of Chemical and Biological Engineering and.
Anders P HakanssonMicrobiology and Immunology, and The Witebsky Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-4200.
Blaine A PfeiferDepartments of Chemical and Biological Engineering and blainepf@buffalo.edu.

Funding

Pneumococcal transition from nasopharyngeal biofilm carriage to otitis mediaR01DC013554 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI CAMPAGNARI, ANTHONY A · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
A Hybrid Biomaterial-biological Vector for Antigen Presenting Cell Gene DeliveryR03AI088485 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI PFEIFER, BLAINE A. · 2010 to 2011
$145k
NIAID NIH HHS AI088485NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI088485NIDCD NIH HHS DC013554NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic vaccines offer a treatment opportunity based upon successful gene delivery to specific immune cell modulators. Driving the process is the vector chosen for gene cargo packaging and subsequent delivery to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) capable of triggering an immune cascade. As such, the delivery process must successfully navigate a series of requirements and obstacles associated with the chosen vector and target cell. In this work, we present the development and assessment of a hybrid gene delivery vector containing biological and biomaterial components. Each component was chosen to design and engineer gene delivery separately in a complimentary and fundamentally distinct fashion. A bacterial (Escherichia coli) inner core and a biomaterial [poly(beta-amino ester)]-coated outer surface allowed the simultaneous application of molecular biology and polymer chemistry to address barriers associated with APC gene delivery, which include cellular uptake and internalization, phagosomal escape, and intracellular cargo concentration. The approach combined and synergized normally disparate vector properties and tools, resulting in increased in vitro gene delivery beyond individual vector components or commercially available transfection agents. Furthermore, the hybrid device demonstrated a strong, efficient, and safe in vivo humoral immune response compared with traditional forms of antigen delivery. In summary, the flexibility, diversity, and potential of the hybrid design were developed and featured in this work as a platform for multivariate engineering at the vector and cellular scales for new applications in gene delivery immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsAnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsCell LineEscherichia coliFemaleGenetic EngineeringGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesImmunizationMiceMice, Inbred BALB CModels, AnimalOvalbuminVaccines, DNAOvalbuminVaccines, DNAbactofectioncationic polymersimmunizationnonviral vectorsvaccination

Identifiers

PMID25114239
PMCPMC4151754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.