ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2014
Voltage control of Ca²⁺ permeation through N-type calcium (Ca(V)2.2) channels.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Cav2 calcium channel gating modifiers with agonist activity and therapeutic potential to treat neuromuscular disease.Neuropharmacology · 2018Article
- Evolutionary insights into T-type CaThe Journal of general physiology · 2017Article
- Single channel measurements demonstrate the voltage dependence of permeation through N-type and L-type CaV channels.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Voltage-gated calcium (Ca(V)) channels deliver Ca(2+) to trigger cellular functions ranging from cardiac muscle contraction to neurotransmitter release. The mechanism by which these channels select for Ca(2+) over other cations is thought to involve multiple Ca(2+)-binding sites within the pore. Although the Ca(2+) affinity and cation preference of these sites have been extensively investigated, the effect of voltage on these sites has not received the same attention. We used a neuronal preparation enriched for N-type calcium (Ca(V)2.2) channels to investigate the effect of voltage on Ca(2+) flux. We found that the EC50 for Ca(2+) permeation increases from 13 mM at 0 mV to 240 mM at 60 mV, indicating that, during permeation, Ca(2+) ions sense the electric field. These data were nicely reproduced using a three-binding-site step model. Using roscovitine to slow Ca(V)2.2 channel deactivation, we extended these measurements to voltages <0 mV. Permeation was minimally affected at these hyperpolarized voltages, as was predicted by the model. As an independent test of voltage effects on permeation, we examined the Ca(2+)-Ba(2+) anomalous mole fraction (MF) effect, which was both concentration and voltage dependent. However, the Ca(2+)-Ba(2+) anomalous MF data could not be reproduced unless we added a fourth site to our model. Thus, Ca(2+) permeation through Ca(V)2.2 channels may require at least four Ca(2+)-binding sites. Finally, our results suggest that the high affinity of Ca(2+) for the channel helps to enhance Ca(2+) influx at depolarized voltages relative to other ions (e.g., Ba(2+) or Na(+)), whereas the absence of voltage effects at negative potentials prevents Ca(2+) from becoming a channel blocker. Both effects are needed to maximize Ca(2+) influx over the voltages spanned by action potentials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.