Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25113974›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2014

Tight regulation of ubiquitin-mediated DNA damage response by USP3 preserves the functional integrity of hematopoietic stem cells.

Cesare Lancini, Paul C M van den Berk, Joseph H A Vissers, Gaetano Gargiulo, Ji-Ying Song, Danielle Hulsman, Michela Serresi, Ellen Tanger, Marleen Blom, Conchita Vens and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. DNA Damage Response Regulation by Histone Ubiquitination.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cesare LanciniDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Paul C M van den BerkDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Joseph H A VissersDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gaetano GargiuloDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ji-Ying SongDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Danielle HulsmanDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Michela SerresiDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ellen TangerDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marleen BlomDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Conchita VensDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Maarten van LohuizenDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Heinz JacobsDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Elisabetta CitterioDivision of Molecular Genetics, Division of Biological Stress Response, and Division of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands e.citterio@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLLaboratory of Molecular Genetics · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone ubiquitination at DNA breaks is required for activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair. How the dynamic removal of this modification by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) impacts genome maintenance in vivo is largely unknown. To address this question, we generated mice deficient for Ub-specific protease 3 (USP3; Usp3Δ/Δ), a histone H2A DUB which negatively regulates ubiquitin-dependent DDR signaling. Notably, USP3 deletion increased the levels of histone ubiquitination in adult tissues, reduced the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) reserves over time, and shortened animal life span. Mechanistically, our data show that USP3 is important in HSC homeostasis, preserving HSC self-renewal, and repopulation potential in vivo and proliferation in vitro. A defective DDR and unresolved spontaneous DNA damage contribute to cell cycle restriction of Usp3Δ/Δ HSCs. Beyond the hematopoietic system, Usp3Δ/Δ animals spontaneously developed tumors, and primary Usp3Δ/Δ cells failed to preserve chromosomal integrity. These findings broadly support the regulation of chromatin ubiquitination as a key pathway in preserving tissue function through modulation of the response to genotoxic stress.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinogenesisCell ProliferationCellular SenescenceDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDNA RepairFemaleHematopoietic Stem CellsHistonesHomeostasisLymphopeniaMaleMiceMice, 129 StrainMice, Inbred C57BLHistonesUbiquitin-Specific ProteasesUSP3 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID25113974
PMCPMC4144738
OpenAlexW2163298748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.