Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25113920›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2015

[Transferable skills of healthcare professionals in providing homecare in chronically ill patients].

Joan Escarrabill, Xavier Clèries, Joan Josep Sarrado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joan EscarrabillHospital Clínic, Barcelona, España.
Xavier ClèriesParc Sanitari Pere Virgili, Barcelona, España. Electronic address: xcleries@gmail.com.
Joan Josep SarradoInstitut d'Estudis de la Salut, Barcelona, España.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESInstitut Català de la Salut · ESParque Sanitario Pere Virgili · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the relevance level of non-technical skills of those professionals dedicated to the healthcare of patients with chronic diseases, from an analysis of home care professionals.

designQuantitative and qualitative research conducted in 2 phases: 1.st from November 2010 to March 2011 and 2.nd from December 2012 to August 2013.

settingHealth Region of Barcelona city.

participantsDuring the 1.st phase, 30 professionals from homecare teams (3 from Primary Care and 3 from Hospitals). In 2.nd phase, 218 professionals from 50 Primary Healthcare Centres and 7 home care programmes.

methodPurposive sampling in was used in the1st phase, and randomized sampling in the 2.nd phase. Likert scales and focus group were used.

resultsA total of 19 skill categories were identified in the 1.st phase. In the 2.nd phase 3 metacategories were established: comprehensive patient-centered care, interprofessional organization, and inter-health care fields and interpersonal skills.

conclusionsIt is necessary to improve and secure the professionals relationships between levels of healthcare, continuity of healthcare, biopsychosocial model and holistic attention to patients and relatives, looking at emotions, expectations, feelings, beliefs and values. It is essential to design and implement continuing training in transferable skills in every healthcare centre, through active methodologies.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHome Care ServicesPrimary Health CareProfessional CompetenceChronic DiseaseHumansAtención domiciliariaChronic diseaseCompetencias no técnicasEnfermedades crónicasHome careNon technical skills

Identifiers

PMID25113920
PMCPMC6985640
OpenAlexW2093357526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.