Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25113842›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2014

Quantitative multimodality imaging in cancer research and therapy.

Thomas E Yankeelov, Richard G Abramson, C Chad Quarles

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultra-fast light-field microscopy with event detection.Light, science & applications · 2024
    Article
  7. Engineering Heterogeneous Tumor Models for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multimodal analysis methods in predictive biomedicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. MRI techniques for immunotherapy monitoring.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Multi-scale optoacoustic molecular imaging of brain diseases.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas E YankeelovDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, AA-1105 Medical Center North, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232-2310, USA.
Richard G AbramsonDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, AA-1105 Medical Center North, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232-2310, USA.
C Chad QuarlesDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, AA-1105 Medical Center North, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232-2310, USA.

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI STACIE B DUSETZINA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Multidisciplinary Training in Basic and Translational Imaging of CancerR25CA092043 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MANNING, HENRY CHARLES · 2001 to 2015
$6.6M
Quantitative MRI for Predicting Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant TherapyU01CA142565 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S., NANDA, RITA · 2010 to 2019
$4.5M
MRI Assessment of Tumor Perfusion, Permeability and CellularityR01CA158079 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARLES, CHRISTOPHER CHAD · 2011 to 2021
$3.5M
Image Driven Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Treatment Response in Breast CancerU01CA174706 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
Evaluation and Validation of Imaging Biomarkers of Tumor Response to TreatmentR01CA138599 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MCINTYRE, JAMES OLIVER · 2010 to 2015
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138599NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158079NCI NIH HHS R25 CA092043NCI NIH HHS U01 CA142565NCI NIH HHS U01 CA174706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in hardware and software have enabled the realization of clinically feasible, quantitative multimodality imaging of tissue pathophysiology. Earlier efforts relating to multimodality imaging of cancer have focused on the integration of anatomical and functional characteristics, such as PET-CT and single-photon emission CT (SPECT-CT), whereas more-recent advances and applications have involved the integration of multiple quantitative, functional measurements (for example, multiple PET tracers, varied MRI contrast mechanisms, and PET-MRI), thereby providing a more-comprehensive characterization of the tumour phenotype. The enormous amount of complementary quantitative data generated by such studies is beginning to offer unique insights into opportunities to optimize care for individual patients. Although important technical optimization and improved biological interpretation of multimodality imaging findings are needed, this approach can already be applied informatively in clinical trials of cancer therapeutics using existing tools. These concepts are discussed herein.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID25113842
PMCPMC4909117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.