Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25113840›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2014

Vessel caliber--a potential MRI biomarker of tumour response in clinical trials.

Kyrre E Emblem, Christian T Farrar, Elizabeth R Gerstner, Tracy T Batchelor, Ronald J H Borra, Bruce R Rosen, A Gregory Sorensen, Rakesh K Jain

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03458455 (Improved Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Brain Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03458455 unknown statusnot on this map

Improved Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Brain Tumors

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOslo University HospitalRan2013 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsBrain MetastasesArmsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in translational imaging of the microcirculation.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Implications of neurovascular uncoupling in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of brain tumors.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. A theoretical framework for determining cerebral vascular function and heterogeneity from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Brain Vascular Imaging Techniques.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kyrre E EmblemThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Christian T FarrarDepartment of Radiology and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Elizabeth R GerstnerDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Tracy T BatchelorDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Ronald J H BorraDepartment of Radiology and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Bruce R RosenDepartment of Radiology and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
A Gregory SorensenSiemens Healthcare Health Services, 51 Valley Stream Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355, USA.
Rakesh K JainEdwin L. Steele Laboratory of Tumor Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Funding

Vascular Normalization: Rolse of Perivascular CellsP01CA080124 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JAIN, RAKESH K. · 2000 to 2016
$35.0M
Quantitative MRI of Glioblastoma ResponseU01CA154601 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE · 2011 to 2016
$3.4M
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE RESEARCHT32CA009502 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOORE, ANNA · 1985 to 2013
$2.0M
Toward Multi-Center MR Brain PerfusionR01NS060918 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHMAINDA, KATHLEEN MARIE, STUFFLEBEAM, STEVEN · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
A Siemens MAGNETOTOM Trio 3 Tesla MRI SystemS10RR021110 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2006 to 2006
$500k
Novel MRI Vascular Biomarkers for the Detection of Tumor InvasionR21CA155862 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FARRAR, CHRISTIAN T, KIM, YOUNG R · 2011 to 2012
$423k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA080124NCI NIH HHS P01CA80124NCI NIH HHS R21 CA155862NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009502NCI NIH HHS T32-CA009502NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154601NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR021110NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR021110‑01A1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the importance of blood vessels and angiogenesis in cancer has increased considerably over the past decades, and the assessment of tumour vessel calibre and structure has become increasingly important for in vivo monitoring of therapeutic response. The preferred method for in vivo imaging of most solid cancers is MRI, and the concept of vessel-calibre MRI has evolved since its initial inception in the early 1990s. Almost a quarter of a century later, unlike traditional contrast-enhanced MRI techniques, vessel-calibre MRI remains widely inaccessible to the general clinical community. The narrow availability of the technique is, in part, attributable to limited awareness and a lack of imaging standardization. Thus, the role of vessel-calibre MRI in early phase clinical trials remains to be determined. By contrast, regulatory approvals of antiangiogenic agents that are not directly cytotoxic have created an urgent need for clinical trials incorporating advanced imaging analyses, going beyond traditional assessments of tumour volume. To this end, we review the field of vessel-calibre MRI and summarize the emerging evidence supporting the use of this technique to monitor response to anticancer therapy. We also discuss the potential use of this biomarker assessment in clinical imaging trials and highlight relevant avenues for future research.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorBlood VesselsClinical Trials as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25113840
PMCPMC4445139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.