Enhancing the efficacy of radiation therapy: premises, promises, and practicality.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Modular Supramolecular Peptide Platform Reveals Atomic-Number-Dependent Mechanisms Driving Radioenhancement.ACS nano · 2025
   Article
2. Analysis of prognostic factors of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and construction and validation of a prediction nomogram based on SEER database.European journal of medical research · 2022
   Article
3. The changing paradigm of tumour response to irradiation.The British journal of radiology · 2017
   Review
4. Improving the Predictive Value of Preclinical Studies in Support of Radiotherapy Clinical Trials.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
   Review
5. Radiotherapy: Changing the Game in Immunotherapy.Trends in cancer · 2016
   Review
6. Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2016
   Review
7. Preclinical Data on Efficacy of 10 Drug-Radiation Combinations: Evaluations, Concerns, and Recommendations.Translational oncology · 2016
   Review
8. Personalized radiotherapy: concepts, biomarkers and trial design.The British journal of radiology · 2015
   Review
9. Exploiting biological and physical determinants of radiotherapy toxicity to individualize treatment.The British journal of radiology · 2015
   Review
10. Evaluation of the Effect of Radiosurgery for Target and Non-Target Lesions in Patients with Brain Metastases Using RANO-BM Criteria.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as