Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25113762›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2014

Cranial stereotactic radiosurgery: current status of the initial paradigm shifter.

Jason P Sheehan, Chun-Po Yen, Cheng-Chia Lee, Jay S Loeffler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Focused Ultrasound and Other Lesioning Therapies in Movement Disorders.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Simultaneous integrated protection : A new concept for high-precision radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason P SheehanJason P. Sheehan, Chun-Po Yen, Cheng-Chia Lee, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Jay S. Loeffler, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. jsheehan@virginia.edu.
Chun-Po YenJason P. Sheehan, Chun-Po Yen, Cheng-Chia Lee, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Jay S. Loeffler, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Cheng-Chia LeeJason P. Sheehan, Chun-Po Yen, Cheng-Chia Lee, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Jay S. Loeffler, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Jay S LoefflerJason P. Sheehan, Chun-Po Yen, Cheng-Chia Lee, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Jay S. Loeffler, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was first described by Lars Leksell in 1951. It was proposed as a noninvasive alternative to open neurosurgical approaches to manage a variety of conditions. In the following decades, SRS emerged as a unique discipline involving a collegial partnership among neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical physicists. SRS relies on the precisely guided delivery of high-dose ionizing radiation to an intracranial target. The focused convergence of multiple beams yields a potent therapeutic effect on the target and a steep dose fall-off to surrounding structures, thereby minimizing the risk of collateral damage. SRS is typically administered in a single session but can be given in as many as five sessions or fractions. By providing an ablative effect noninvasively, SRS has altered the treatment paradigms for benign and malignant intracranial tumors, functional disorders, and vascular malformations. Literature on extensive intracranial radiosurgery has unequivocally demonstrated the favorable benefit-to-risk profile that SRS affords for appropriately selected patients. In a departure from conventional radiotherapeutic strategies, radiosurgical principles have recently been extended to extracranial indications such as lung, spine, and liver tumors. The paradigm shift resulting from radiosurgery continues to alter the landscape of related fields.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsHumansRadiosurgeryRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25113762
PMCPMC4152711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.