Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25113759›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2014

Value: a framework for radiation oncology.

Sewit Teckie, Susan A McCloskey, Michael L Steinberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Perceptions and recall of treatment for prostate cancer: A survey of two populations.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Resilience of Radiation Oncology in the COVID Era and Beyond.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluating Frameworks That Provide Value Measures for Health Care Interventions.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2017
    Article
  11. The impact of radiotherapy costs on clinical outcomes in breast cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2015
    Article
  12. Radiation oncology: a snapshot in time, 2014.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sewit TeckieSewit Teckie, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Susan A. McCloskey and Michael L. Steinberg, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Susan A McCloskeySewit Teckie, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Susan A. McCloskey and Michael L. Steinberg, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Michael L SteinbergSewit Teckie, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Susan A. McCloskey and Michael L. Steinberg, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. msteinberg@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current health care system, high costs without proportional improvements in quality or outcome have prompted widespread calls for change in how we deliver and pay for care. Value-based health care delivery models have been proposed. Multiple impediments exist to achieving value, including misaligned patient and provider incentives, information asymmetries, convoluted and opaque cost structures, and cultural attitudes toward cancer treatment. Radiation oncology as a specialty has recently become a focus of the value discussion. Escalating costs secondary to rapidly evolving technologies, safety breaches, and variable, nonstandardized structures and processes of delivering care have garnered attention. In response, we present a framework for the value discussion in radiation oncology and identify approaches for attaining value, including economic and structural models, process improvements, outcome measurement, and cost assessment.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsHumansNeoplasmsRadiation Oncology

Identifiers

PMID25113759
PMCPMC4152714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.