ArticleFolia microbiologica2015
Species identification of strains belonging to genus Citrobacter using the biochemical method and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic landscape ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Occurrence of virulence factors and antimicrobial susceptibility ofJournal of veterinary research · 2025Article
- Article
- Antibiotic Resistance Hotspot: Comparative Genomics Reveals Multiple Strains of Multidrug-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Whole-genome sequencing of clinical isolates of Citrobacter Europaeus in China carrying blaAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024Article
- Draft genome sequence of multidrug-resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Genes inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Draft Genome Sequence of the Multidrug-Resistant Citrobacter freundii 132-2 Strain Isolated from a Domestic Duck in Bangladesh.Microbiology resource announcements · 2023Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Characteristics of Antimicrobial Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Detection and Antimicrobial Resistance ofJournal of veterinary research · 2022Article
- A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Enterobacterales Isolates from Fish and Prawns.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Autof ms1000 and Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS Platforms for Routine Identification of Clinical Microorganisms.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Isolation of Ciprofloxacin and Ceftazidime-Resistant Enterobacterales From Vegetables and River Water Is Strongly Associated With the Season and the Sample Type.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Strains of genus Citrobacter (152 isolates from 1950 to 1988 deposited in the Czech National Collection of Type Cultures, Prague) were re-classified using biological and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) methods. One-hundred thirty-six strains (ca. 90 %) were identified to the species level using the biological method with evaluation by Farmer matrix. MALDI-TOF MS exhibited better identification capability, the data being more compact; the method was unambiguously successful in typing 145 (95 %) strains. Comparison of the results of identification by the two methods revealed differences (for 12 samples) in identified species which, considering all biochemical and/or MS characteristics, could be attributed to the natural variability of strains and close relation of the misidentified species (all of them belonged to the Citrobacter freundii complex). Taking into account all the above data, both methods can be considered reliable; however, the MALDI-TOF MS exhibits higher accuracy, efficiency, and rapidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25113540What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.