Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25112462›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015

Gender differences in resources and negotiation among highly motivated physician-scientists.

Emma Holliday, Kent A Griffith, Rochelle De Castro, Abigail Stewart, Peter Ubel, Reshma Jagsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Diversity, equity, and inclusion in anesthesiology.International anesthesiology clinics · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluating the Role of Self-Esteem on Differential Career Outcomes by Gender in Academic Medicine.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Contract Negotiation Skills: A Workshop for Women in Medicine.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma HollidayUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kent A Griffith
Rochelle De Castro
Abigail Stewart
Peter Ubel
Reshma Jagsi

Funding

Examining How Gender Differences in Outcomes Develop Among Physician ResearchersR01HL101997 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JAGSI, RESHMA · 2009 to 2012
$863k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL101997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResources, including space, equipment, funding, personnel, and protected time, are essential in academic medical careers. Negotiation often plays a key role in the distribution of these resources.

objectiveThis study explored gender differences in resources, negotiation behaviors, and negotiation outcomes in a sample of career development awardees.

designPostal survey of a cohort of 1,708 clinician-researchers with responses from 1,275 (75 % response rate).

participantsResearchers who received NIH K08 or K23 awards between 2006 and 2009. MAIN MEASURES: We analyzed gender differences in resources, negotiation behaviors, and negotiation outcomes, using regression models adjusted for race, K award type, K award year, degree, academic rank, specialty, and institutional funding. KEY

resultsOver one-fifth of respondents reported inadequate access to research space and one-third had asked for increased space or equipment. Perceived adequacy of these physical resources did not differ significantly by gender, but a higher proportion of women reported inadequate access to grants administrators (34.8 %) and statistical support (49.9 %) than men (26.9 %; p = 0.002 and 43.4 %; p = 0.025, respectively). Women were more likely to have asked for reduction in clinical hours (24.1 % vs. 19.3 %; p = 0.02) and to have raised concerns about unfair treatment (50.2 % vs. 38.2 %; p < 0.001). Overall, 42.9 % of women and 35.9 % of men asked for a raise in the two years preceding the survey (p = 0.09), and among those who had asked for increased resources, the likelihood that the request was granted did not differ significantly by gender.

conclusionMany career development award recipients report resource needs and negotiate for increased resources. Gender differences in perceived access to research support personnel exist even in this select cohort of K awardees. Institutions should provide appropriate training in negotiation and ensure adequate and equitable distribution of resources to promote academic success.

Indexed as

MotivationNegotiatingAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansPhysicians, WomenResearch PersonnelSex FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25112462
PMCPMC4370986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.