ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015
Gender differences in resources and negotiation among highly motivated physician-scientists.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Gender differences in faculty rank among academic physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Posttraumatic stress, perceived hostile intention and reactions to peer provocation: A longitudinal study in US inner-city youth.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- Variability in first academic medicine job offers in pulmonary and critical care medicine.ATS scholar · 2026Article
- Variability in First Academic Medicine Job Offers in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Participant Experiences with EMPOWER: Benefits, Barriers, and Best Practices for an Online Peer Mentorship and Leadership Program for Women in Academic Medicine.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- How we achieve satisfaction in training - A German-wide survey on preferred training conditions among trainers and trainees for board certification in gastroenterology.Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2024Article
- An investigation into gender distributions in scholarly publications among dental faculty members in Iran.PloS one · 2024Article
- Posttraumatic Stress and Perceived Interpersonal Provocation in Adolescents.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2023Article
- Wondering If I'd Get There Quicker If I Was a Man: Factors Contributing to Delayed Academic Advancement of Women in Infectious Diseases.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Are North Carolina clinicians delivering opioid use disorder treatment to Medicaid beneficiaries?Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2022Article
- Moving the Needle Toward Fair Compensation in Pediatric Nephrology.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- More than grit: growing and sustaining physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion in anesthesiology.International anesthesiology clinics · 2021Article
- Article
- Women remain underrepresented in leadership positions in academic gastroenterology throughout the United States.Annals of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Evaluating the Role of Self-Esteem on Differential Career Outcomes by Gender in Academic Medicine.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2020Article
- Peering Through the Glass Ceiling: A Mixed Methods Study of Faculty Perceptions of Gender Barriers to Academic Advancement in Infectious Diseases.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Experiences of Negotiations for Improving Research Environment and Burnout among Young Physician Researchers in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Contract Negotiation Skills: A Workshop for Women in Medicine.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020Article
- Perceptions of Pressures to Alter or Misrepresent Time Allocation Among Clinician-Researchers With NIH Career Development Awards.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResources, including space, equipment, funding, personnel, and protected time, are essential in academic medical careers. Negotiation often plays a key role in the distribution of these resources.
objectiveThis study explored gender differences in resources, negotiation behaviors, and negotiation outcomes in a sample of career development awardees.
designPostal survey of a cohort of 1,708 clinician-researchers with responses from 1,275 (75 % response rate).
participantsResearchers who received NIH K08 or K23 awards between 2006 and 2009. MAIN MEASURES: We analyzed gender differences in resources, negotiation behaviors, and negotiation outcomes, using regression models adjusted for race, K award type, K award year, degree, academic rank, specialty, and institutional funding. KEY
resultsOver one-fifth of respondents reported inadequate access to research space and one-third had asked for increased space or equipment. Perceived adequacy of these physical resources did not differ significantly by gender, but a higher proportion of women reported inadequate access to grants administrators (34.8 %) and statistical support (49.9 %) than men (26.9 %; p = 0.002 and 43.4 %; p = 0.025, respectively). Women were more likely to have asked for reduction in clinical hours (24.1 % vs. 19.3 %; p = 0.02) and to have raised concerns about unfair treatment (50.2 % vs. 38.2 %; p < 0.001). Overall, 42.9 % of women and 35.9 % of men asked for a raise in the two years preceding the survey (p = 0.09), and among those who had asked for increased resources, the likelihood that the request was granted did not differ significantly by gender.
conclusionMany career development award recipients report resource needs and negotiate for increased resources. Gender differences in perceived access to research support personnel exist even in this select cohort of K awardees. Institutions should provide appropriate training in negotiation and ensure adequate and equitable distribution of resources to promote academic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.