ArticleInfection2015
Efficacy of daptomycin lock therapy in the treatment of bloodstream infections related to long-term catheter.
Article in Infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial lock therapy in central-line associated bloodstream infections: a systematic review.Infection · 2015Pooled it
- Is an oritavancin catheter lock solution active against biofilms of staphylococci and enterococci?Heliyon · 2025Article
- Usefulness of daptomycin lock therapy in children with catheter-related bacteremia after failed vancomycin lock therapy.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2023Article
- Article
- A Dalbavancin Lock Solution Can Reduce Enterococcal Biofilms After Freezing.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- High-Dose Daptomycin Is Effective as an Antibiotic Lock Therapy in a Rabbit Model of Staphylococcus epidermidis Catheter-Related Infection.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConcomitant systemic and intracatheter antibiotic therapy is a therapeutic option for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patient fitted with long-term intravenous central catheters. CRBSI are mainly caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Daptomycin (DPT) is an antibiotic active against Gram-positive bacteria with high bactericidal activity and good biofilm penetration.
objectiveTo study the efficacy of DPT given systemically and as lock therapy in the treatment of CRBSI. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review was conducted of adult patients with a long-term central venous catheter (CVC) receiving both systemic intravenous and intracatheter lock therapy for CRBSI. The primary outcome was catheter maintenance, following clinical success and microbiological eradication.
resultsEight patients who had failed previous standard therapy (vancomycin 7, cefazolin 1) were included in the study. In all but one, coagulase-negative staphylococci were repeatedly isolated. The other patient had enterococcal infection. DPT, given intravenously and as lock therapy, was successful in six of eight cases. The mean time to negative blood cultures was 2 days (range 1-6). In two cases neither clinical nor microbiological response was documented and the catheter was removed. DISCUSSION: Systemic and intracatheter therapy with DPT is feasible, carries no toxicity and is apparently effective. DPT might be a suitable therapeutic option in CRBSI to achieve CVC sterilization and preserve the catheter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.