Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25111919›Full record

Observational studyInfection control and hospital epidemiology2014

Multisite exploration of clinical decision making for antibiotic use by emergency medicine providers using quantitative and qualitative methods.

Larissa May, Glencora Gudger, Paige Armstrong, Gillian Brooks, Pamela Hinds, Rahul Bhat, Gregory J Moran, Lisa Schwartz, Sara E Cosgrove, Eili Y Klein and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The Effect of Expert Feedback on Antibiotic Prescribing in Pediatrics: Experimental Evidence.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Shifting the antibiotic rhetoric in children from 'just in case' to 'disclose the risk': Has the time come?Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Larissa MayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Glencora Gudger
Paige Armstrong
Gillian Brooks
Pamela Hinds
Rahul Bhat
Gregory J Moran
Lisa Schwartz
Sara E Cosgrove
Eili Y Klein
Richard E Rothman
Cynthia Rand
George Washington University · USJohns Hopkins University · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's NationalUL1TR000075 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2012 to 2015
$13.7M
Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's NationalKL2TR000076 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2012 to 2014
$756k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000076NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000076NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000075NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000075NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI107906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore current practices and decision making regarding antimicrobial prescribing among emergency department (ED) clinical providers.

methodsWe conducted a survey of ED providers recruited from 8 sites in 3 cities. Using purposeful sampling, we then recruited 21 providers for in-depth interviews. Additionally, we observed 10 patient-provider interactions at one of the ED sites. SAS 9.3 was used for descriptive and predictive statistics. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic, constructivist approach with consensus coding using NVivo 10.0. Field and interview notes collected during the observational study were aligned with themes identified through individual interviews.

resultsOf 150 survey respondents, 76% agreed or strongly agreed that antibiotics are overused in the ED, while half believed they personally did not overprescribe. Eighty-nine percent used a smartphone or tablet in the ED for antibiotic prescribing decisions. Several significant differences were found between attending and resident physicians. Interview analysis identified 42 codes aggregated into the following themes: (1) resource and environmental factors that affect care; (2) access to and quality of care received outside of the ED consult; (3) patient-provider relationships; (4) clinical inertia; and (5) local knowledge generation. The observational study revealed limited patient understanding of antibiotic use. Providers relied heavily upon diagnostics and provided limited education to patients. Most patients denied a priori expectations of being prescribed antibiotics.

conclusionsPatient, provider, and healthcare system factors should be considered when designing interventions to improve antimicrobial stewardship in the ED setting.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingAdultAgedDecision Support TechniquesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInappropriate PrescribingInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25111919
PMCPMC4768482
OpenAlexW2087903096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.