Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25111834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Prevalence of HPV 16 and HPV 18 lineages in Galicia, Spain.

Sonia Pérez, Ana Cid, Amparo Iñarrea, Mónica Pato, María José Lamas, Bárbara Couso, Margarita Gil, María Jesús Alvarez, Sonia Rey, Isabel López-Miragaya and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sonia PérezDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Ana CidDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital of Ourense, Ourense, Spain.
Amparo IñarreaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Mónica PatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Ourense, Ourense, Spain.
María José LamasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Bárbara CousoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Ourense, Ourense, Spain.
Margarita GilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
María Jesús AlvarezDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Sonia ReyDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Isabel López-MiragayaDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Santiago MelónDepartment of Virology, University Hospital of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
María de OñaDepartment of Virology, University Hospital of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variants of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 (HPV16/18) could differ in their cancer risk. We studied the prevalence and association with high-grade cervical lesions of different HPV16/18 variant lineages in a case-control study including 217 cases (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or grade 3 or worse: CIN2 or CIN3+) and 116 controls (no CIN2 or CIN3+ in two-year follow-up). HPV lineages were determined by sequencing the long control region (LCR) and the E6 gene. Phylogenetic analysis of HPV16 confirmed that isolates clustered into previously described lineages: A (260, 87.5%), B (4, 1.3%), C (8, 2.7%), and D (25, 8.4%). Lineage D/lineage A strains were, respectively, detected in 4/82 control patients, 19/126 CIN3+ cases (OR = 3.1, 95%CI: 1.0-12.9, p = 0.04), 6/1 glandular high-grade lesions (OR = 123, 95%CI: 9.7-5713.6, p<0.0001), and 4/5 invasive lesions (OR = 16.4, 95%CI: 2.2-113.7, p = 0.002). HPV18 clustered in lineages A (32, 88.9%) and B (4, 11.1%). Lineage B/lineage A strains were respectively detected in 1/23 control patients and 2/5 CIN3+ cases (OR = 9.2, 95%CI: 0.4-565.4, p = 0.12). In conclusion, lineages A of HPV16/18 were predominant in Spain. Lineage D of HPV16 was associated with increased risk for CIN3+, glandular high-grade lesions, and invasive lesions compared with lineage A. Lineage B of HPV18 may be associated with increased risk for CIN3+ compared with lineage A, but the association was not significant. Large well-designed studies are needed before the application of HPV lineage detection in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenotyping TechniquesHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansSpainUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25111834
PMCPMC4128731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.