Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25111804›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A computational approach to evaluate the androgenic affinity of iprodione, procymidone, vinclozolin and their metabolites.

Corrado Lodovico Galli, Cristina Sensi, Amos Fumagalli, Chiara Parravicini, Marina Marinovich, Ivano Eberini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structure optimization and molecular dynamics studies of new tumor-selectiveJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the Antidiabetic Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structure-Activity Relationship ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in chemistry · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Corrado Lodovico GalliDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.
Cristina SensiDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.
Amos FumagalliDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.
Chiara ParraviciniDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.
Marina MarinovichDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.
Ivano EberiniDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our research is aimed at devising and assessing a computational approach to evaluate the affinity of endocrine active substances (EASs) and their metabolites towards the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the androgen receptor (AR) in three distantly related species: human, rat, and zebrafish. We computed the affinity for all the selected molecules following a computational approach based on molecular modelling and docking. Three different classes of molecules with well-known endocrine activity (iprodione, procymidone, vinclozolin, and a selection of their metabolites) were evaluated. Our approach was demonstrated useful as the first step of chemical safety evaluation since ligand-target interaction is a necessary condition for exerting any biological effect. Moreover, a different sensitivity concerning AR LBD was computed for the tested species (rat being the least sensitive of the three). This evidence suggests that, in order not to over-/under-estimate the risks connected with the use of a chemical entity, further in vitro and/or in vivo tests should be carried out only after an accurate evaluation of the most suitable cellular system or animal species. The introduction of in silico approaches to evaluate hazard can accelerate discovery and innovation with a lower economic effort than with a fully wet strategy.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAmino Acid SequenceAminoimidazole CarboxamideAnimalsBridged Bicyclo CompoundsHumansHydantoinsMolecular Sequence DataOxazolesProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryRatsReceptors, AndrogenSpecies SpecificityZebrafishAminoimidazole CarboxamideBridged Bicyclo CompoundsHydantoinsiprodioneOxazolesprocymidoneReceptors, Androgenvinclozolin

Identifiers

PMID25111804
PMCPMC4128724
OpenAlexW2043972899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.