Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25111654›Full record

ArticleMuscle & nerve2014

The National ALS Registry: a recruitment tool for research.

Angela M Malek, David E Stickler, Vinicius C Antao, D Kevin Horton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscle & nerve, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Research Registries: A Tool to Advance Understanding of Rare Neuro-Ophthalmic Diseases.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela M MalekDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Room 305L, Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, USA.
David E Stickler
Vinicius C Antao
D Kevin Horton

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSubject recruitment is critical for understanding fatal diseases like ALS, however linking patients with researchers can be challenging. The U.S. population-based National ALS Registry allows recruitment of persons with ALS (PALS) for research opportunities.

methodsThe Registry's Research Notification Mechanism was used to recruit PALS aged ≥21 years; participants completed a Web-based epidemiologic survey. PALS (n = 2,232) were sent an email describing the study, and 268 surveys were completed.

resultsThe mean age (± SD) of eligible participants was 57.7 ± 9.3 years for men and 61.5 ± 8.9 for women. Most were men (63%) and Caucasian (92%). Of 256 potentially eligible participants, 37.5% (n = 96) returned an authorization to disclose protected health information. ALS was confirmed for 94% (83/88) from physician responses.

conclusionsThis analysis demonstrates the National ALS Registry's usefulness in recruiting PALS for research. This recruitment source can potentially foster the discovery of better treatment options and therapies, and of prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchPatient SelectionRegistriesAdultAgedAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisCommunity Health PlanningFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung AdultALSamyotrophic lateral sclerosisNational ALS Registryrecruitmentresearch

Identifiers

PMID25111654
PMCPMC4206601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.