Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25111430›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2014

Individual versus significant-other-enhanced brief motivational intervention for alcohol in emergency care.

Peter M Monti, Suzanne M Colby, Nadine R Mastroleo, Nancy P Barnett, Chad J Gwaltney, Timothy R Apodaca, Damaris J Rohsenow, Molly Magill, Aruna Gogineni, Michael J Mello and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter M MontiCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Suzanne M ColbyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Nadine R MastroleoCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Nancy P BarnettCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Chad J GwaltneyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Timothy R ApodacaCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Damaris J RohsenowCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Molly MagillCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Aruna GogineniCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Michael J MelloAlpert Medical School, Brown University.
Walter L BifflAlpert Medical School, Brown University.
William G CioffiAlpert Medical School, Brown University.
Brown University · US

Funding

Virology CoreP01AA019072 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WRAY, TYLER BLAKE · 2010 to 2024
$19.7M
MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING FOR ETOH+ TEENS IN THE ERR01AA009892 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 1994 to 2014
$8.3M
Advancing a Bio-Psycho-Social Alcohol Treatment Research and Mentoring ProgramK05AA019681 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA019681NIAAA NIH HHS K05AA019681NIAAA NIH HHS P01 AA019072NIAAA NIH HHS P01AA019072NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA009892NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA009892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEffects of brief motivational interventions (BMIs) for heavy drinkers identified by alcohol-related emergency department (ED) visits are mixed. The successes of including significant others (SOs) in behavioral treatment suggest that involving SOs in ED-delivered BMI might prove beneficial. This study investigated the relative efficacy of an SO-enhanced motivational intervention (SOMI) compared with an individual motivational intervention (IMI) to address heavy drinking in emergency care settings.

methodED (n = 317) or trauma unit (n = 89) patients were randomly assigned to receive either an IMI or an SOMI and were reassessed at 6 and 12 months for alcohol consumption, alcohol-related consequences, and perceived alcohol-specific SO support.

resultsGeneralized estimating equation analyses showed consistent reductions over time for both alcohol consumption and consequences. At 1-year follow-up, the average reduction in total drinks consumed per week was greater for patients in the SOMI condition than the IMI condition. In SOMI, 9.4% more patients moved to within the national guidelines for weekly drinking than did IMI patients. Frequency of heavy drinking and negative alcohol consequences showed no differential effects of intervention.

conclusionsEmergence of a modest treatment effect at 12 months suggests that SO involvement in the SOMI condition may have led to more sustained positive influence on patient drinking than in the IMI condition. Implications and limitations regarding SO involvement in brief treatment are discussed.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationCognitive Behavioral TherapyConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicEmergency Services, PsychiatricFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch DesignTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25111430
PMCPMC4244267
OpenAlexW2061183454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.